GII ranks 3rd and CSIO 17th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
CSIO vs GII
GII −0.25pt a year
0.65%0.40%
GII 3.1×the volume
13.4K41.6K
CSIO vs GII Performance
+16.4%+8.8%
- CSIO 0.65%
- GII 0.40%, better
- CSIO $52M
- GII $962M
- CSIO
- GII +11.3%
- CSIO
- GII 2.69%
- CSIO 30
- GII 89
- CSIO 13.4K sh
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- CSIO $28.61
- GII $74.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSIO | GII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A93Higher | A72 |
| Tradability | C46 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | B68Higher |
| Durability | D26 | A85Higher |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. CSIO and GII are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSIOC
GIIA
In short
CSIO Global infrastructure without the index. Cohen & Steers runs CSIO as a high-conviction, actively managed book of infrastructure stocks, chosen by fundamental company analysis rather than benchmark weight.
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
Stated mandate
CSIO The Fund seeks total return. It pursues this objective primarily through a high-conviction portfolio of global common stocks and other equity securities issued by infrastructure companies, using active management and fundamental company analysis.
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSIO vs GII Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSIO vs GII Cost
Overpaying CSIO vs GII
$4,627
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSIO 0.65%
$12,717
GII 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSIO | GII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $723 | $440 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,793 | $1,647 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $8,090 | $4,627 |
- 0.65%CSIO
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
CSIO 22nd cheapest of 33 funds
CSIO vs GII Dividends
- CSIO
- GII 2.69%
- CSIO
- GII $2.02
- CSIO $0.10
- GII $0.78
- CSIO Sep 29, 2026
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- CSIO Sep 30, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- CSIO Quarterly
- GII Twice a year
Distribution history
CSIO vs GII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSIO GII 12.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSIO GII 1.17
- Worst fall
- CSIO GII −20.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CSIO 0.17GII 0.56
CSIO and GII in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

