IFRA ranks 1st and CSIO 17th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
CSIO vs IFRA
IFRA −0.35pt a year
0.65%0.30%
IFRA 29.6×the volume
13.4K398K
CSIO vs IFRA Performance
+16.4%+12.2%
- CSIO 0.65%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- CSIO $49M
- IFRA $4.07B
- CSIO
- IFRA +12.7%
- CSIO
- IFRA 1.74%
- CSIO 31
- IFRA 165
- CSIO 13.4K sh
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- CSIO $28.54
- IFRA $58.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSIO | IFRA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | A93Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | C46 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | A82Higher |
| Durability | D26 | A81Higher |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. CSIO and IFRA are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSIOC
IFRAA
In short
CSIO Global infrastructure without the index. Cohen & Steers runs CSIO as a high-conviction, actively managed book of infrastructure stocks, chosen by fundamental company analysis rather than benchmark weight.
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
Stated mandate
CSIO The Fund seeks total return. It pursues this objective primarily through a high-conviction portfolio of global common stocks and other equity securities issued by infrastructure companies, using active management and fundamental company analysis.
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSIO vs IFRA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSIO vs IFRA Cost
Overpaying CSIO vs IFRA
$6,568
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSIO 0.65%
$12,717
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSIO | IFRA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $545 | $618 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,113 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $6,149 | $6,568 |
- 0.65%CSIO
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
CSIO 22nd cheapest of 33 funds
CSIO vs IFRA Dividends
- CSIO
- IFRA 1.74%
- CSIO
- IFRA $1.02
- CSIO $0.10
- IFRA $0.26
- CSIO Sep 29, 2026
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- CSIO Sep 30, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- CSIO Quarterly
- IFRA Quarterly
Distribution history
CSIO vs IFRA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSIO IFRA 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSIO IFRA 0.92
- Worst fall
- CSIO IFRA −19.9%
- Market sensitivity
- CSIO 0.17IFRA 0.96
CSIO and IFRA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


