GNR ranks 2nd and CSNR 9th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
CSNR vs GNR
GNR −0.10pt a year
0.50%0.40%
GNR 20.3×the volume
16.8K341K
CSNR vs GNR Performance
+29.1%+31.9%
- CSNR 0.50%
- GNR 0.40%, better
- CSNR $16M
- GNR $5.39B
- CSNR +29.1%
- GNR +31.9%, better
- CSNR 1.75%
- GNR 2.42%, better
- CSNR 56
- GNR 110
- CSNR 16.8K sh
- GNR 341K sh, better
- CSNR $36.89
- GNR $75.69
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSNR | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A80Higher |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | F19 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | A77Higher |
| Durability | D26 | A89Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. CSNR and GNR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSNRD
GNRA
In short
CSNR A stock-picker's route into commodities: roughly 60 global natural resource companies, chosen by an active manager using top-down and bottom-up work rather than index weight, for 0.50% a year.
GNR Most resource ETFs are energy funds in a hard hat. GNR spreads a global, large-cap lineup across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining, roughly 90 names tracking an S&P natural resources index since 2010.
Stated mandate
CSNR The Fund seeks total return by investing in securities of natural resource companies. Its adviser actively selects investments using top-down and bottom-up analysis.
GNR The fund seeks to provide investment results corresponding generally to the total return performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It provides exposure to large-cap companies across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSNR vs GNR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSNR vs GNR Cost
Overpaying CSNR vs GNR
$1,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSNR 0.50%
$9,979
GNR 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSNR | GNR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $723 | $177 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,793 | $667 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $8,090 | $1,889 |
- 0.50%CSNR
- 0.40%GNR, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
GNR 4th cheapest of 14 funds
CSNR 10th cheapest of 14 funds
CSNR vs GNR Dividends
- CSNR 1.75%
- GNR 2.42%, better
- CSNR $0.64
- GNR $1.82
- CSNR $0.15
- GNR $0.86
- CSNR Sep 29, 2026
- GNR Jun 1, 2026
- CSNR Sep 30, 2026
- GNR Jun 3, 2026
- CSNR Quarterly
- GNR Twice a year
Distribution history
CSNR vs GNR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSNR 17.2%GNR 15.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSNR 1.46GNR 0.75
- Worst fall
- CSNR −15.3%GNR −25.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CSNR 0.05GNR 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.