HAP ranks 4th and CSNR 9th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
CSNR vs HAP
HAP −0.09pt a year
0.50%0.41%
HAP 1.7×the volume
16.8K27.9K
CSNR vs HAP Performance
+29.1%+32.5%
- CSNR 0.50%
- HAP 0.41%, better
- CSNR $16M
- HAP $326M
- CSNR +29.1%
- HAP +32.5%, better
- CSNR 1.75%
- HAP 1.84%, better
- CSNR 56
- HAP 130
- CSNR 16.8K sh
- HAP 27.9K sh, better
- CSNR $36.89
- HAP $74.17
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CSNR | HAP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | F19 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | C47 | A73Higher |
| Durability | D26 | B60Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. CSNR and HAP are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CSNRD
HAPA
In short
CSNR A stock-picker's route into commodities: roughly 60 global natural resource companies, chosen by an active manager using top-down and bottom-up work rather than index weight, for 0.50% a year.
HAP Metals, energy and farm goods in one global basket. HAP has held hard-asset producers since 2008, spreading across roughly 150 companies worldwide rather than betting on one commodity or one continent.
Stated mandate
CSNR The Fund seeks total return by investing in securities of natural resource companies. Its adviser actively selects investments using top-down and bottom-up analysis.
HAP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vector Global Natural Resources Index, which covers global natural-resources companies involved in metals, energy sources, and agricultural products.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CSNR vs HAP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CSNR vs HAP Cost
Overpaying CSNR vs HAP
$1,698
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CSNR 0.50%
$9,979
HAP 0.41%
$8,281
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CSNR | HAP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $741 | $159 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,860 | $600 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $8,281 | $1,698 |
- 0.50%CSNR
- 0.41%HAP, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
HAP 5th cheapest of 14 funds
CSNR 10th cheapest of 14 funds
CSNR vs HAP Dividends
- CSNR 1.75%
- HAP 1.84%, better
- CSNR $0.64
- HAP $1.36
- CSNR $0.15
- HAP $1.36
- CSNR Sep 29, 2026
- HAP Dec 22, 2025
- CSNR Sep 30, 2026
- HAP Dec 26, 2025
- CSNR Quarterly
- HAP Annual
Distribution history
CSNR vs HAP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CSNR 17.2%HAP 15.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- CSNR 1.46HAP 0.98
- Worst fall
- CSNR −15.3%HAP −25.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CSNR 0.05HAP 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.