Skip to content

CSNR vs HAP

Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF

CSNRDNYSE Arca

VanEck Natural Resources ETF

HAPANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

HAP −0.09pt a year

CSNR0.50%HAP0.41%

Avg volume · 30D

HAP 1.7×the volume

CSNR16.8KHAP27.9K

CSNR vs HAP Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+29.1%CSNR+32.5%HAP

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CSNR +29.1%. HAP +32.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%40%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CSNR 0.50%
HAP 0.41%, better
Fund size
CSNR $16M
HAP $326M
1Y total return
CSNR +29.1%
HAP +32.5%, better
Yield (12M)
CSNR 1.75%
HAP 1.84%, better
Holdings
CSNR 56
HAP 130
Avg volume (30D)
CSNR 16.8K sh
HAP 27.9K sh, better
NAV per share
CSNR $36.89
HAP $74.17
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CSNR: Cost 35, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 19, Holdings 47, Durability 26. HAP: Cost 68, Risk 74, Mission not scored, Tradability 64, Holdings 73, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for CSNR, HAP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCSNRHAP
Cost30% weightD35B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB61A74Higher
Tradability15% weightF19B64Higher
Holdings10% weightC47A73Higher
Durability5% weightD26B60Higher

Rank among Natural Resources funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CSNR and HAP are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Natural Resources⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

HAP ranks 4th and CSNR 9th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.

  1. Rank 1AIGEiShares North American Natural Resources ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AGNRState Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETFScore 75
  3. Rank 2ANANRState Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 4AHAPVanEck Natural Resources ETFScore 68
  5. Rank 5BCCNRALPS Funds CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 8CNRESXtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETFScore 43
  7. Rank 9DCSNRCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETFScore 37
  8. Rank 10DFTWOStrive Natural Resources and Security ETFScore 36

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CSNRDCohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF

HAPAVanEck Natural Resources ETF

In short

CSNR A stock-picker's route into commodities: roughly 60 global natural resource companies, chosen by an active manager using top-down and bottom-up work rather than index weight, for 0.50% a year.

HAP Metals, energy and farm goods in one global basket. HAP has held hard-asset producers since 2008, spreading across roughly 150 companies worldwide rather than betting on one commodity or one continent.

Stated mandate

CSNR The Fund seeks total return by investing in securities of natural resource companies. Its adviser actively selects investments using top-down and bottom-up analysis.

HAP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vector Global Natural Resources Index, which covers global natural-resources companies involved in metals, energy sources, and agricultural products.

Why people hold it

  • CSNR Costs 0.50% a year, which undercuts the typical actively managed US equity ETF fee. Cheap is not usually how active resource funds introduce themselves.
  • Roughly 60 names, picked globally. The manager can lean into an oil major or a copper miner instead of taking whatever weight an index hands out.
  • Owns shares of resource companies, not futures, inside a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper. Ordinary brokerage tax reporting, with cash paid out quarterly.
  • Scores in the upper half of its active-equity peer group on our review, helped by the fee and the clarity of its mandate.
  • HAP Global by mandate, not North America only like IGE or NANR: it holds producers of metals, energy sources and agricultural products around the world.
  • Launched in 2008, so the fund has run through a full commodity boom and bust, not just the last good stretch.
  • About 150 holdings across three resource groups, so no single miner, driller or grain house runs the show.

Worth knowing

  • CSNR Launched in 2025 with a modest asset base and light trading. Spreads can widen, so the price you see is not always the price you get.
  • One slice of the market. Energy, metals and agriculture stocks move with commodity cycles, and those cycles can be brutal on the way down.
  • No index to fall back on. Returns hinge on the adviser's calls, and the track record is too short to judge those calls yet.
  • HAP No price edge: the 0.41% fee lands exactly at the category median, and peers such as NANR (0.35%) and IGE (0.37%) charge less.
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads can run wider than in the category's busiest names.
  • Cash arrives once or twice a year, not quarterly or monthly.

Full CSNR profile⁠

Full HAP profile⁠

CSNR vs HAP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CSNR vs HAP Cost

Overpaying CSNR vs HAP

$1,698

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CSNR 0.50%

    $9,979

  • HAP 0.41%

    $8,281

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CSNR 0.50%
  • HAP 0.41%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530CSNR $9,979HAP $8,281

Year by year

YearCSNRHAPOverpaying
10$900$741$159
20$3,460$2,860$600
30$9,979$8,281$1,698

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%CSNR
  • 0.41%HAP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Natural Resources funds
  • Median 0.46%

HAP 5th cheapest of 14 funds

CSNR 10th cheapest of 14 funds

CSNR vs HAP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CSNR 1.75%
HAP 1.84%, better
Payout (12M)
CSNR $0.64
HAP $1.36
Last payment
CSNR $0.15
HAP $1.36
Ex-dividend
CSNR Sep 29, 2026
HAP Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
CSNR Sep 30, 2026
HAP Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
CSNR Quarterly
HAP Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

CSNRQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll CSNR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 7 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 28, 2025 $0.13; Jun 27, 2025 $0.30; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 15, 2025 $0.13; Mar 30, 2026 $0.14; Jun 29, 2026 $0.23; Sep 29, 2026 $0.15. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
HAPAnnual · 9 paymentsAll HAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2017 $0.75; Dec 20, 2018 $0.92; Dec 23, 2019 $1.00; Dec 21, 2020 $0.94; Dec 20, 2021 $1.02; Dec 19, 2022 $1.61; Dec 18, 2023 $1.60; Dec 23, 2024 $1.21; Dec 22, 2025 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

CSNR vs HAP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CSNR 17.2%since Mar 2025HAP 15.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CSNR 1.46since Mar 2025HAP 0.98
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CSNR −15.3%since Feb 2025HAP −25.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CSNR 0.05HAP 0.59

Popular comparisons

  • CSNRDvsIGEA

    Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · iShares North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAPAvsIGEA

    VanEck Natural Resources ETF · iShares North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSNRDvsGNRA

    Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAPAvsGNRA

    VanEck Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CSNRDvsNANRA

    Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF · State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HAPAvsNANRA

    VanEck Natural Resources ETF · State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.41% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.