NANR ranks 2nd and HAP 4th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
HAP vs NANR
NANR −0.06pt a year
0.41%0.35%
NANR 1.02×the volume
27.9K28.5K
NANR +1.1pt
+11.9%+13.0%
HAP vs NANR Performance
+78.0%+123.4%
- HAP 0.41%
- NANR 0.35%, better
- HAP $326M
- NANR $840M
- HAP +32.5%
- NANR +40.2%, better
- HAP 1.84%, better
- NANR 1.63%
- HAP 130
- NANR 204
- HAP 27.9K sh
- NANR 28.5K sh, better
- HAP $74.17
- NANR $87.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HAP | NANR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A72 | |
| Risk | A74Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B64 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. HAP and NANR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HAPA
NANRA
In short
HAP Metals, energy and farm goods in one global basket. HAP has held hard-asset producers since 2008, spreading across roughly 150 companies worldwide rather than betting on one commodity or one continent.
NANR Natural resources without the passport: roughly 200 large and mid cap US and Canadian energy, mining and agriculture names in one basket, for 0.35% a year.
Stated mandate
HAP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vector Global Natural Resources Index, which covers global natural-resources companies involved in metals, energy sources, and agricultural products.
NANR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. It targets large- and mid-cap publicly traded U.S. and Canadian companies in energy, metals and mining, and agriculture-related natural-resources businesses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HAP vs NANR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HAP vs NANR Cost
Overpaying HAP vs NANR
$1,155
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HAP 0.41%
$8,281
NANR 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HAP | NANR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $741 | $634 | $107 |
| 20 | $2,860 | $2,454 | $406 |
| 30 | $8,281 | $7,126 | $1,155 |
- 0.41%HAP
- 0.35%NANR, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
NANR cheapest of 14 funds
HAP 5th cheapest of 14 funds
HAP vs NANR Dividends
- HAP 1.84%, better
- NANR 1.63%
- HAP $1.36
- NANR $1.41
- HAP $1.36
- NANR $0.71
- HAP Dec 22, 2025
- NANR Jun 1, 2026
- HAP Dec 26, 2025
- NANR Jun 3, 2026
- HAP Annual
- NANR Twice a year
Distribution history
HAP vs NANR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- HAP
- NANR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HAP 15.1%, betterNANR 19.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- HAP 0.98, betterNANR 0.95
- Worst fall
- HAP −25.7%, betterNANR −26.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HAP 0.59NANR 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.41% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.