Skip to content

CTA vs JPFP

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF

CTABNYSE Arca

JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF

JPFPBNasdaq

Overlap

10.1%by weight

Expense ratio

JPFP −0.27pt a year

CTA0.86%JPFP0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

CTA 90.8×the volume

CTA565KJPFP6.22K

CTA vs JPFP Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.8%CTA+0.5%JPFP

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTA +11.8%. JPFP +0.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%5%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTA 0.86%
JPFP 0.59%, better
Fund size
CTA $1.36B
JPFP $122M
1Y total return
CTA +16.1%
JPFP No data
Yield (12M)
CTA 5.18%
JPFP No data
Holdings
CTA 25
JPFP 471
Avg volume (30D)
CTA 565K sh, better
JPFP 6.22K sh
NAV per share
CTA $30.12
JPFP $49.66
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTA: Cost 43, Risk 22, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 45, Durability 83. JPFP: Cost 100, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 25, Holdings not scored, Durability 45.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTA, JPFP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAJPFP
Cost30% weightC43A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF22D37Higher
Tradability15% weightB61HigherD25
Holdings10% weightC45Not scored
Durability5% weightA83HigherC45

Rank among Managed Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTA and JPFP are both graded against the same 14 Managed Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Managed Futures⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

JPFP ranks 4th and CTA 8th of 14 funds in the Managed Futures Category.

  1. Rank 4BFFUTFidelity Managed Futures ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 4BJPFPJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 6BDBMFiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 7CFMFFirst Trust Managed Futures Strategy FundScore 46
  5. Rank 8BCTASimplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFScore 45
  6. Rank 8CKMLMKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTABSimplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF

JPFPBJPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF

In short

CTA Simplify didn't build its own trend models, it rented them. CTA runs systematic long/short futures programs from Altis Partners, a commodity trading advisor with 20-plus years in the chair, at the lowest fee in its peer group.

JPFP Most managed futures ETFs make you sell stocks to make room. JPFP stacks instead: full large-cap U.S. equity exposure plus an active long/short trend program across global equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, for 0.59%.

Stated mandate

CTA The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by systematically investing in futures to create an absolute return profile and capture price trends.

JPFP The fund seeks capital appreciation by combining an active managed futures strategy with a U.S. large-cap equity strategy in one investment. The managed-futures component uses derivatives for long or short exposure across global equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.

Why people hold it

  • CTA Charges 0.75% a year, undercutting every other fund in its managed-futures peer group, including DBMF at 0.85% and ASMF at 0.80%.simplify.us
  • The engine is outsourced to Altis Partners, a commodity trading advisor with over 20 years of experience, running a suite of systematic models rather than a single signal.simplify.us
  • Goes long or short across 50-plus markets: equity, Treasury, commodity and currency futures. The mandate targets absolute return with low correlation to stocks.simplify.usyahoo.com
  • Pays monthly and trades actively, unusual plumbing for an alternatives sleeve.
  • JPFP Stacked, not swapped. Derivatives let the fund carry broad large-cap U.S. equity exposure while the managed futures sleeve runs alongside it in the same wrapper.jpmorgan.com
  • At 0.59% it comes in below the typical managed futures ETF fee and under the top-scoring names in the group, including WTMF at 0.65% and DBMF at 0.85%.
  • The trend sleeve can go long or short global equities, fixed income, currencies and commodities, so it is not locked to the direction of any single market.jpmorgan.com
  • Built by J.P. Morgan's Multi-Asset Solutions team, which ran this stacking approach in its own portfolios before putting it in an ETF. One of the stronger builds in a crowded niche.jpmorgan.com

Worth knowing

  • CTA Trend systems need sustained moves to work with. Choppy, fast-reversing markets are where they struggle, so the ride is bumpier and less predictable than a plain index fund.
  • Actively managed with no benchmark index to check it against, and commodity exposure runs through a wholly owned Cayman subsidiary that can hold up to 25% of assets.yahoo.comsimplify.us
  • Launched in 2022, so the live record is short and spans only a handful of market regimes.
  • JPFP The live record starts at the 2026 launch, and the fund is still building assets and volume, so spreads can run wider than at the category's biggest names.
  • Both engines use derivatives, and both can go against you at once. Trend models are designed to follow moves, so sharp reversals can whipsaw the futures sleeve.jpmorgan.com
  • Fully active with proprietary models and no benchmark index to check it against, so outcomes ride on the manager's signals rather than a published rulebook.jpmorgan.com

Full CTA profile⁠

Full JPFP profile⁠

CTA vs JPFP Holdings

How CTA and JPFP differ

Overlap by weight

10.1%

Shared holdings make up 11.9% of CTA and 10.1% of JPFP.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both10.1%
  • Sector11 Sectors15.5%
  • Countryby domicile99.3%

Sector

Sector weights in CTA and JPFP, widest gap first
SectorMore in CTAMore in JPFP
FinancialsCTA +84.5 points
TechnologyJPFP +42.0 points
IndustrialsJPFP +15.2 points
CommunicationJPFP +13.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryJPFP +6.4 points
Health CareJPFP +4.6 points
EnergyJPFP +2.7 points
UtilitiesJPFP +0.2 points
MaterialsJPFP +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CTA and JPFP, widest gap first
CountryMore in CTAMore in JPFP
United StatesCTA +0.7 points
Other countries (8)JPFP +0.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CTA745.5%
  • JPFP54.3%

Securities held

  • CTA20
  • JPFP441

Asset class

CTA
Alternatives
JPFP
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in CTA20
  • In both0
  • Only in JPFP441

Only in CTA

20 securities, 100% of CTA by weight

  • Simplify E Govt Money Mkt Etf276.93%
  • Brent Crude Futr JAN27147.37%
  • Brent Crude Futr FEB2757.93%

Only in JPFP

441 securities, 81.7% of JPFP by weight

  • JPMorgan U.s. Government14.94%
  • Apple Inc Common Stock4.43%
  • NVIDIA Corp Common Stock4.36%

Weight gaps

CTA and JPFP share no securities.

All 88 CTA holdings⁠All 427 JPFP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTA vs JPFP Cost

Overpaying CTA vs JPFP

$4,733

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTA 0.86%

    $16,368

  • JPFP 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTA 0.86%
  • JPFP 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530CTA $16,368JPFP $11,635

Year by year

YearCTAJPFPOverpaying
10$1,525$1,058$467
20$5,768$4,051$1,717
30$16,368$11,635$4,733

Expense ratio

  • 0.86%CTA
  • 0.59%JPFP, cheaper
  • Middle half of Managed Futures funds
  • Median 0.85%

JPFP cheapest of 14 funds

CTA 8th cheapest of 14 funds

CTA vs JPFP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CTA 5.18%
JPFP No data
Payout (12M)
CTA $1.55
JPFP None
Last payment
CTA $0.13
JPFP No data
Ex-dividend
CTA Oct 27, 2026
JPFP No data
Paid on
CTA Oct 30, 2026
JPFP No data
Frequency
CTA Monthly
JPFP No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CTAMonthly · 24 paymentsAll CTA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2023 $0.10; Sep 27, 2023 $0.10; Dec 26, 2023 $1.64; Mar 25, 2024 $0.15; Jun 25, 2024 $0.15; Sep 25, 2024 $0.30; Dec 23, 2024 $0.74; Mar 26, 2025 $0.12; Jun 25, 2025 $0.25; Aug 26, 2025 $0.10; Sep 25, 2025 $0.10; Oct 28, 2025 $0.10; Nov 21, 2025 $0.10; Dec 23, 2025 $0.10; Jan 27, 2026 $0.10; Feb 24, 2026 $0.15; Mar 26, 2026 $0.15; Apr 27, 2026 $0.15; May 26, 2026 $0.15; Jun 25, 2026 $0.13; Jul 28, 2026 $0.13; Aug 26, 2026 $0.13; Sep 25, 2026 $0.13; Oct 27, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
JPFPAll JPFP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTA vs JPFP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTA 14.9%JPFP No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTA 0.49JPFP No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTA −20.8%since Mar 2022JPFP No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTA −0.19JPFP 1.19

CTA and JPFP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CTABvsIMFA

    Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsIMFA

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTABvsWTMFA

    Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsWTMFA

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTABvsISMFB

    Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • JPFPBvsISMFB

    JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF · Ishares Managed Futures Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.