Skip to content

CTAU vs XDEC

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

CTAUCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December

XDECCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAU −0.55pt a year

CTAU0.30%XDEC0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XDEC 8.4×the volume

CTAU947XDEC7.96K

CTAU vs XDEC Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%CTAU+0.2%XDEC

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAU −0.4%. XDEC +0.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%0.75%1%1.25%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
CTAU 0.30%, better
XDEC 0.85%
Fund size
CTAU $1M
XDEC $208M
1Y total return
CTAU No data
XDEC +8.8%
Holdings
CTAU 4
XDEC 4
Avg volume (30D)
CTAU 947 sh
XDEC 7.96K sh, better
NAV per share
CTAU $25.14
XDEC $43.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAU: Cost 92, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 10, Holdings not scored, Durability 8. XDEC: Cost 40, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 36, Holdings 58, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAU, XDEC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAUXDEC
Cost30% weightA92HigherC40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45HigherC44
Tradability15% weightF10D36Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB58
Durability5% weightF8A79Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAU and XDEC are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 7 ›

XDEC ranks 6th and CTAU 7th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 4BXJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 50
  2. Rank 6CXDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  3. Rank 7CCTAUCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAUCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

XDECCFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December

In short

CTAU No data

XDEC Most buffered funds trade upside away for protection. This December-dated First Trust fund goes after both: roughly twice the price gain of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a yearly cap, with the first 15% of losses absorbed.

Stated mandate

CTAU No data

XDEC The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to a 10.06% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the stated outcome period.

Why people hold it

CTAU No data

  • XDEC Accelerated and buffered in one wrapper: it aims for about 2x the reference ETF's positive price return up to a cap, while absorbing the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period.
  • The reference is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust itself, not a custom index built for the product, so the exposure being doubled is plain US large-cap.
  • One rung of a dated ladder. Siblings like XMAR, XJUN and XNOV run the same structure on different reset months, so entry isn't pinned to a single December date.
  • Live since 2021, which puts several full December-to-December outcome periods behind the strategy rather than a single test run.

Worth knowing

CTAU No data

  • XDEC At 0.85% a year it runs above accelerated peers such as XTAP and XDSQ at 0.79%. Layered options structures carry a higher price tag than plain beta.
  • The cap and buffer are engineered for a full outcome period, December to December, and the cap is reset at each new period. Buy mid-period and your own cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms.
  • Thinly traded next to mainstream index funds, so limit orders earn their keep. The design targets price return, not an income stream.

Full CTAU profile⁠

Full XDEC profile⁠

CTAU vs XDEC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAU vs XDEC Cost

Overpaying XDEC vs CTAU

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAU 0.30%

    $6,149

  • XDEC 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAU 0.30%
  • XDEC 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XDEC $16,199CTAU $6,149

Year by year

YearCTAUXDECOverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTAU, cheaper
  • 0.85%XDEC
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTAU cheapest of 7 funds

XDEC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

CTAU vs XDEC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTAU None
XDEC None

Distribution history

CTAUAll CTAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XDECAll XDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTAU vs XDEC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAU No dataXDEC 4.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAU No dataXDEC 1.23
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAU No dataXDEC −11.7%since Dec 2021
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAU 0.00XDEC 0.30

Popular comparisons

  • CTAUCvsXMARB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XDECCvsXMARB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAUCvsXNOVC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XDECCvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTAUCvsXSEPC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XDECCvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - December · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.