Skip to content
etf.net

CTAU vs XJUN

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

CTAUCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June

XJUNBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTAU −0.55pt a year

CTAU0.30%XJUN0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

XJUN 7.6×the volume

CTAU947XJUN7.24K

CTAU vs XJUN Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%CTAU0.0%XJUN

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTAU −0.4%. XJUN 0.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0.25%0.5%0.75%1%1.25%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
CTAU 0.30%, better
XJUN 0.85%
Fund size
CTAU $1M
XJUN $137M
1Y total return
CTAU No data
XJUN +6.8%
Holdings
CTAU 4
XJUN 4
Avg volume (30D)
CTAU 947 sh
XJUN 7.24K sh, better
NAV per share
CTAU $25.14
XJUN $45.41
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTAU: Cost 92, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 10, Holdings not scored, Durability 8. XJUN: Cost 40, Risk 62, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings 62, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTAU, XJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTAUXJUN
Cost30% weightA92HigherC40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45B62Higher
Tradability15% weightF10C45Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB62
Durability5% weightF8A75Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTAU and XJUN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

XJUN ranks 4th and CTAU 7th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 4CXJANFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 50
  2. Rank 4BXJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 50
  3. Rank 6CXDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  4. Rank 7CCTAUCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTAUCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

XJUNBFT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June

In short

CTAU No data

XJUN The fund that launched First Trust's Enhance & Moderate Buffer line: one wrapper aiming for twice SPY's price gain up to a yearly cap, while absorbing the first 15% of its losses. Options math, reset every June.

Stated mandate

CTAU No data

XJUN The Fund seeks approximately twice the positive price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust, subject to an 11.04% upside cap. It seeks to protect the first 15% of losses in that reference asset during the June 22, 2026–June 17, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

CTAU No data

  • XJUN Two jobs, one ticker: approximately 2x the reference SPY ETF's positive price move up to a stated cap, with the first 15% of its losses buffered over a June-to-June outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • The series original. XJUN opened First Trust's Enhance & Moderate Buffer lineup in 2021, giving the doubled-upside-plus-buffer design its longest live track record.etfgi.com
  • The terms are contractual, not discretionary: the fund holds FLEX options on SPY, and each period's cap and buffer are published before the window starts.ftportfolios.com
  • The same design resets in other calendar months (XMAR, XNOV, XDEC), so the June window can be one rung of a ladder rather than a single dated bet.

Worth knowing

CTAU No data

  • XJUN The cap is what pays for the doubled upside: gains past it stay with the market. The deal also tracks SPY's price only, so its dividends sit outside the math.ftportfolios.com
  • 0.85% a year, above accelerated-structure peers such as XTAP and XDSQ at 0.79%.
  • Cap and buffer are engineered for the full outcome period; mid-period buyers get different effective terms. Volume is light, so limit orders are the norm.ftportfolios.com

Full CTAU profile⁠

Full XJUN profile⁠

CTAU vs XJUN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTAU vs XJUN Cost

Overpaying XJUN vs CTAU

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTAU 0.30%

    $6,149

  • XJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTAU 0.30%
  • XJUN 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530XJUN $16,199CTAU $6,149

Year by year

YearCTAUXJUNOverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTAU, cheaper
  • 0.85%XJUN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated, 15% Buffer funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTAU cheapest of 7 funds

XJUN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

CTAU vs XJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTAU None
XJUN None

Distribution history

CTAUAll CTAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XJUNAll XJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTAU vs XJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTAU No dataXJUN 4.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTAU No dataXJUN 1.52
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTAU No dataXJUN −9.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTAU 0.00XJUN 0.30

Popular comparisons

  • CTAUCvsXMARB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XJUNBvsXMARB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTAUCvsXNOVC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XJUNBvsXNOVC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - November

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTAUCvsXSEPC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • XJUNBvsXSEPC

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June · FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - September

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.