Skip to content
etf.net

CTJL vs DJUN

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June

DJUNCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.55pt a year

CTJL0.30%DJUN0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

DJUN 39.8×the volume

CTJL920DJUN36.6K

CTJL vs DJUN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+0.9%CTJL+1.0%DJUN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. CTJL +0.9%. DJUN +1.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1.5%2%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
DJUN 0.85%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
DJUN $369M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
DJUN +6.8%
Holdings
CTJL 4
DJUN 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh
DJUN 36.6K sh, better
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
DJUN $50.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. DJUN: Cost 31, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 69, Holdings 69, Durability 70.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, DJUN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLDJUN
Cost30% weightA97HigherD31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherD35
Tradability15% weightF12B69Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB69
Durability5% weightF2A70Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and DJUN are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DJUN ranks 12th and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 10CDMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47
  2. Rank 12CDJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46
  3. Rank 12CDSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 46
  4. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  5. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTJLCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

DJUNCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June

In short

CTJL No data

DJUN DJUN takes the first 5% of an S&P 500 drop on the chin, then absorbs the next 25 points. That is the deep-buffer bargain: no help with the scrapes, real cover in a rout, with an upside cap that resets every June.

Stated mandate

CTJL No data

DJUN The fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a 13.60% upside cap, while buffering losses in the underlying between 5% and 30% during the June 22, 2026 to June 17, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

CTJL No data

  • DJUN Deep, not shallow: the fund is built to absorb losses in the underlying from 5% down to 30%, a 25-point cushion across each one-year outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • Twelve near-identical siblings, one per calendar month (DFEB, DMAR, DSEP and the rest). DJUN owns the June start date, so entries can be laddered across the year.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. Underneath the options wrapper sits plain US large-cap exposure, not a niche index you have to decode.ftportfolios.com
  • Live since 2020, with a fresh cap and buffer struck every June since. This is a seasoned rung of the series, not a launch-week experiment.

Worth knowing

CTJL No data

  • DJUN 0.85% a year lands at the median for deep-buffer funds, but cheaper builds exist: the Pacer Swan SOS Conservative funds (PSCX, PSCW, PSCQ) charge 0.49%.
  • It tracks price return, so S&P 500 dividends are left behind, and the cap puts a ceiling on a big year. Protection is the thing you are paying for.
  • Volume is light, so spreads can widen. And buying mid-period means the cap and cushion you actually get differ from the stated terms set at the June reset.

Full CTJL profile⁠

Full DJUN profile⁠

CTJL vs DJUN Holdings

How CTJL and DJUN differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CTJL and 0.0% of DJUN.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for CTJL and DJUN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CTJL and DJUN, widest gap first
CountryMore in CTJLMore in DJUN
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CTJL101.6%
  • DJUN101.8%

Securities held

  • CTJL3
  • DJUN2

Asset class

CTJL
Equity
DJUN
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in CTJL3
  • In both0
  • Only in DJUN2

Only in CTJL

3 securities, 98.7% of CTJL by weight

  • Spy 06/30/2027 149.14 C76.40%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.52%
  • Spy 06/30/2027 708.43 P2.76%

Only in DJUN

2 securities, 100% of DJUN by weight

  • 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 7.4698.22%
  • 2027-06-17 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 709.402.73%

Weight gaps

CTJL and DJUN share no securities.

All CTJL holdings⁠All 4 DJUN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs DJUN Cost

Overpaying DJUN vs CTJL

$10,050

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • DJUN 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • DJUN 0.85%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DJUN $16,199CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLDJUNOverpaying
10$545$1,508$963
20$2,113$5,706$3,593
30$6,149$16,199$10,050

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.85%DJUN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

DJUN 8th cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs DJUN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
DJUN None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DJUNAll DJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs DJUN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataDJUN 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataDJUN 1.24
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataDJUN −12.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00DJUN 0.45

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsPSCXB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DJUNCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsUFEBB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DJUNCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CTJLCvsPSCQB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • DJUNCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.