Skip to content

CTJL vs PSCJ

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

CTJLCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF

PSCJCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

CTJL −0.19pt a year

CTJL0.30%PSCJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

CTJL 1.6×the volume

CTJL920PSCJ570

CTJL vs PSCJ Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

+0.7%CTJL+0.8%PSCJ

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. CTJL +0.7%. PSCJ +0.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1.5%2%2.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
CTJL 0.30%, better
PSCJ 0.49%
Fund size
CTJL $1M
PSCJ $42M
1Y total return
CTJL No data
PSCJ +7.7%
Holdings
CTJL 4
PSCJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
CTJL 920 sh, better
PSCJ 570 sh
NAV per share
CTJL $25.44
PSCJ $32.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CTJL: Cost 97, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 2. PSCJ: Cost 81, Risk 35, Mission not scored, Tradability 12, Holdings not scored, Durability 34.
Pillar letters and Scores for CTJL, PSCJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCTJLPSCJ
Cost30% weightA97HigherA81
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherD35
Tradability15% weightF12F12
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightF2D34Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CTJL and PSCJ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

PSCJ ranks 6th and CTJL 17th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 6CDNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 50
  2. Rank 6CPSCJPacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETFScore 50
  3. Rank 9CDJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JulyScore 49
  4. Rank 16CDMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MayScore 41
  5. Rank 17CCTJLCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 17CCTJNCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CTJLCCorgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

PSCJCPacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF

In short

CTJL No data

PSCJ A 25-point cushion against S&P 500 losses, priced at 0.49% in a corner of the market where nearly twice that is normal. The July door into Pacer's quarterly deep-buffer lineup: capped upside, reset every 12 months.

Stated mandate

CTJL No data

PSCJ The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while mitigating a defined range of downside losses over approximately one year.

Why people hold it

CTJL No data

  • PSCJ Built to absorb 25 percentage points of S&P 500 downside over each roughly one-year outcome period. That is the deep end of the buffer spectrum, not a token cushion.
  • Charges 0.49% a year, well under the median fee among deep-buffer S&P funds. Unusual restraint for a strategy that runs on custom options contracts.
  • The reference asset is the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so the outcome is tied to plain US large-cap exposure rather than a bespoke index nobody can check.
  • One of four staggered siblings (PSCX January, PSCW April, PSCQ October) at the same 0.49% fee, so a July reset date is a choice rather than a constraint.

Worth knowing

CTJL No data

  • PSCJ The trade for that cushion is a ceiling: upside is capped, and the cap is set fresh at the start of each outcome period. Big S&P years get trimmed.
  • Buy partway through a period and your own buffer and cap differ from the fund's stated terms. The math is measured from the outcome period's start date.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the category's household names. It has also not been paying distributions.

Full CTJL profile⁠

Full PSCJ profile⁠

CTJL vs PSCJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CTJL vs PSCJ Cost

Overpaying PSCJ vs CTJL

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CTJL 0.30%

    $6,149

  • PSCJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CTJL 0.30%
  • PSCJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PSCJ $9,792CTJL $6,149

Year by year

YearCTJLPSCJOverpaying
10$545$883$338
20$2,113$3,394$1,281
30$6,149$9,792$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%CTJL, cheaper
  • 0.49%PSCJ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

CTJL cheapest of 19 funds

PSCJ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds

CTJL vs PSCJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
CTJL None
PSCJ None

Distribution history

CTJLAll CTJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSCJAll PSCJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CTJL vs PSCJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCJ 6.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CTJL No dataPSCJ 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CTJL No dataPSCJ −11.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CTJL 0.00PSCJ 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • CTJLCvsPSCXB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCJCvsPSCXB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTJLCvsUFEBB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCJCvsUFEBB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CTJLCvsPSCQB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSCJCvsPSCQB

    Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.