UAPR ranks 9th and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UAPR
0.5%by weight
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UAPR 4.6×the volume
1.86K8.62K
CTMA vs UAPR Performance
+0.6%+1.6%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UAPR 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UAPR $158M
- CTMA
- UAPR +11.2%
- CTMA
- UAPR 0.00%
- CTMA 4
- UAPR 5
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UAPR 8.62K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UAPR $35.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | F2 | D34Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | F2 | C53Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UAPR are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UAPR Holdings
How CTMA and UAPR differ
0.5%
Shared holdings make up 6.5% of CTMA and 0.5% of UAPR.
Level by level
- Holdings0.5%
- Sector98.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in CTMAMore in UAPR | CTMA | UAPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | CTMA +0.6 points | 39.3% | 38.7% |
| Communication | UAPR +0.6 points | 8.9% | 9.5% |
| Health Care | CTMA +0.5 points | 9.8% | 9.3% |
| Financials | UAPR +0.3 points | 11.7% | 12.0% |
| Industrials | UAPR +0.3 points | 7.5% | 7.8% |
| Energy | CTMA +0.2 points | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Consumer Staples | CTMA +0.2 points | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | UAPR +0.2 points | 9.1% | 9.3% |
| Materials | UAPR +0.2 points | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Real Estate | UAPR +0.1 points | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CTMAMore in UAPR | CTMA | UAPR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CTMA102.3%
- UAPR108.0%
- CTMA3
- UAPR4
Asset class
- CTMA
- Equity
- UAPR
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CTMA3
- In both0
- Only in UAPR4
Only in CTMA
3 securities, 95.8% of CTMA by weight
- Spy 04/30/2027 144.74 C80.04%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.75% 04/30/202713.77%
- Spy 04/30/2027 687.52 P2.00%
Only in UAPR
4 securities, 100% of UAPR by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF105.98%
- Voo 03/31/2027 567.67 P0.95%
- Voo 03/31/2027 621.44 C0.31%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.25%
Weight gaps
CTMA and UAPR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UAPR Cost
Overpaying UAPR vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UAPR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UAPR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UAPR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UAPR 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UAPR Dividends
- CTMA
- UAPR 0.00%
- CTMA None
- UAPR None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UAPR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UAPR 5.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UAPR 1.23
- Worst fall
- CTMA UAPR −10.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UAPR 0.43
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.