UMAR ranks 9th and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UMAR
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UMAR 11.2×the volume
1.86K20.8K
CTMA vs UMAR Performance
+0.8%+1.7%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UMAR 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UMAR $142M
- CTMA
- UMAR +9.8%
- CTMA 4
- UMAR 5
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UMAR 20.8K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UMAR $43.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | F2 | D35Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | F2 | D39Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UMAR are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UMAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UMAR Cost
Overpaying UMAR vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UMAR 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UMAR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UMAR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UMAR 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UMAR Dividends
- CTMA None
- UMAR None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UMAR 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UMAR 1.53
- Worst fall
- CTMA UMAR −8.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UMAR 0.44
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.