UNOV ranks 12th and CTMA 13th of 13 funds in the S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% Category.
CTMA vs UNOV
0.1%by weight
CTMA −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
UNOV 3.6×the volume
1.86K6.67K
CTMA vs UNOV Performance
+0.8%+3.0%
- CTMA 0.30%, better
- UNOV 0.79%
- CTMA $2M
- UNOV $104M
- CTMA
- UNOV +10.0%
- CTMA 4
- UNOV 5
- CTMA 1.86K sh
- UNOV 6.67K sh, better
- CTMA $25.79
- UNOV $41.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CTMA | UNOV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C51Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | F2 | D32Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | F2 | D36Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
Same Category. CTMA and UNOV are both graded against the same 13 S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CTMA vs UNOV Holdings
How CTMA and UNOV differ
0.1%
Shared holdings make up 6.4% of CTMA and 0.1% of UNOV.
Level by level
- Holdings0.1%
- Sector98.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in CTMAMore in UNOV | CTMA | UNOV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication | UNOV +1.0 points | 8.9% | 9.9% |
| Technology | UNOV +0.8 points | 39.3% | 40.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | CTMA +0.4 points | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Financials | CTMA +0.4 points | 11.7% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | CTMA +0.4 points | 9.8% | 9.4% |
| Energy | CTMA +0.3 points | 3.7% | 3.4% |
| Consumer Staples | CTMA +0.3 points | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| Industrials | UNOV +0.1 points | 7.5% | 7.6% |
| Utilities | CTMA +0.1 points | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Materials | UNOV +0.1 points | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CTMAMore in UNOV | CTMA | UNOV |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CTMA102.4%
- UNOV103.2%
- CTMA3
- UNOV4
Asset class
- CTMA
- Equity
- UNOV
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CTMA3
- In both0
- Only in UNOV4
Only in CTMA
3 securities, 96.0% of CTMA by weight
- Spy 04/30/2027 144.74 C80.34%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.75% 04/30/202713.74%
- Spy 04/30/2027 687.52 P1.89%
Only in UNOV
4 securities, 100% of UNOV by weight
- Vanguard S&P 500 ETF98.52%
- Voo 10/29/2027 660.07 P4.12%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.31%
- Voo 10/29/2027 722.58 C0.14%
Weight gaps
CTMA and UNOV share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CTMA vs UNOV Cost
Overpaying UNOV vs CTMA
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CTMA 0.30%
$6,149
UNOV 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CTMA | UNOV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CTMA, cheaper
- 0.79%UNOV
- Middle half of S&P 500 Ultra Buffer 30% funds
- Median 0.79%
CTMA cheapest of 13 funds
UNOV 2nd cheapest of 13 funds
CTMA vs UNOV Dividends
- CTMA None
- UNOV None
Distribution history
CTMA vs UNOV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CTMA UNOV 5.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- CTMA UNOV 1.28
- Worst fall
- CTMA UNOV −9.1%
- Market sensitivity
- CTMA 0.41UNOV 0.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.