Skip to content

DAUG vs DFEB

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August

DAUGCCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

DFEBCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

DAUG0.85%DFEB0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

DAUG 1.9×the volume

DAUG26.3KDFEB13.6K

5Y return · a year

DFEB +1.9pt

DAUG+6.2%DFEB+8.1%

DAUG vs DFEB Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+34.9%DAUG+47.4%DFEB

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. DAUG +34.9%. DFEB +47.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%10%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
DAUG 0.85%
DFEB 0.85%
Fund size
DAUG $446M
DFEB $456M
1Y total return
DAUG +7.6%
DFEB +9.9%, better
Holdings
DAUG 3
DFEB 3
Avg volume (30D)
DAUG 26.3K sh, better
DFEB 13.6K sh
NAV per share
DAUG $47.42
DFEB $51.65
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DAUG: Cost 31, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings 48, Durability 79. DFEB: Cost 31, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 63, Durability 74.
Pillar letters and Scores for DAUG, DFEB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDAUGDFEB
Cost30% weightD31D31
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC45B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA74A77Higher
Holdings10% weightC48B63Higher
Durability5% weightA79HigherA74

Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DAUG and DFEB are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30%⁠

Category · 19 funds
See all 19 ›

DFEB ranks 4th and DAUG 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSCXPacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 1BUFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BPSCQPacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETFScore 60
  4. Rank 4CDFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  5. Rank 4CPSCWPacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 9CDJULFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - JulyScore 49
  7. Rank 10CDAUGFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - AugustScore 47
  8. Rank 10CDMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - MarchScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DAUGCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August

DFEBCFT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February

In short

DAUG Insurance with a deductible. DAUG bears the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then absorbs the next 25 points of losses, and in exchange your upside is capped at a level reset every August. Running since 2019.

DFEB A buffer with a deductible. DFEB lets the first 5% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust land on you, then covers the next 25 points, in exchange for an upside cap that resets every February.

Stated mandate

DAUG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.98% upside cap and protection for losses in the -5% to -30% range during the current outcome period.

DFEB The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.87% upside cap, while protecting against Underlying ETF losses from -5% through -30% during the February 23, 2026–February 19, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • DAUG The cushion sits where drawdowns bite: SPY losses between -5% and -30% are absorbed, a 25-point buffer, before losses pass through one-for-one again.sec.gov
  • Twelve siblings run the same deep-buffer recipe on a monthly cycle (DJAN through DDEC), so you can pick a reset month or spread money across several start dates.
  • Terms are knowable up front: the new cap is set at each August reset, disclosed in a filing and posted to the fund's site before the period begins.sec.gov
  • Live since 2019, so this August reset has been rolled through real market stress rather than a backtest.
  • DFEB Deep coverage where it hurts: the fund targets protection against reference-ETF losses from -5% through -30%, a 25-point band, over each one-year outcome period.
  • One of twelve monthly vintages on the same reference ETF (DMAR, DJUN, DDEC and the rest), so entries can be laddered across the calendar instead of hinging on one start date.
  • Running since 2020, it has rolled through several full outcome periods, and it sits in the upper half of its deep-buffer peer group.
  • At 0.85%, the fee sits right at the median for deep-buffer funds tracking this kind of strategy.

Worth knowing

  • DAUG The reference is SPY's price return, so S&P 500 dividends are not part of what you capture. That is part of what the buffer costs.sec.gov
  • Buffer and cap are designed for the full outcome period. Buy midstream and your own remaining cushion and upside differ from the headline terms.sec.gov
  • 0.85% matches the deep-buffer cohort median, while Pacer's SOS conservative funds (PSCX, PSCW) charge 0.49%. Volume is light here, so spreads can run wider.
  • DFEB The trade for depth: you absorb the first 5% of losses yourself, and gains stop at a cap that is reset each February from option pricing at the time.
  • It tracks price return only, so the reference ETF's dividends are not passed along, and the fund has not been paying distributions.
  • Cheaper deep-buffer options exist (PSCX and PSCW run 0.49%), and DFEB trades lightly, so limit orders are the sane way in and out.

Full DAUG profile⁠

Full DFEB profile⁠

DAUG vs DFEB Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DAUG vs DFEB Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,199

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DAUG 0.85%

    $16,199

  • DFEB 0.85%

    $16,199

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DAUG 0.85%
  • DFEB 0.85%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530DAUG $16,199DFEB $16,199

Year by year

YearDAUGDFEB
10$1,508$1,508
20$5,706$5,706
30$16,199$16,199

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%DAUG
  • 0.85%DFEB
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
  • Median 0.85%

DAUG 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DFEB 8th cheapest of 19 funds

DAUG vs DFEB Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
DAUG None
DFEB None

Distribution history

DAUGAll DAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DFEBAll DFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

DAUG vs DFEB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • DAUG
  • DFEB
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: DAUG −15.3% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DAUG 6.2%DFEB 6.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DAUG 1.33DFEB 1.57, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DAUG −15.3%DFEB −10.0%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DAUG 0.53DFEB 0.50

Popular comparisons

  • DAUGCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsPSCXB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DAUGCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsUFEBB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DAUGCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - August · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFEBCvsPSCQB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - February · Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.