PSCQ ranks 3rd and DAUG 10th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
DAUG vs PSCQ
PSCQ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
DAUG 10.7×the volume
26.3K2.47K
PSCQ +2.7pt
+6.2%+8.9%
DAUG vs PSCQ Performance
+34.9%+52.8%
- DAUG 0.85%
- PSCQ 0.49%, better
- DAUG $446M
- PSCQ $49M
- DAUG +7.6%
- PSCQ +9.5%, better
- DAUG 3
- PSCQ 3
- DAUG 26.3K sh, better
- PSCQ 2.47K sh
- DAUG $47.42
- PSCQ $32.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DAUG | PSCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | C48 | |
| Durability | A79Higher | F17 |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. DAUG and PSCQ are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DAUGC
PSCQB
In short
DAUG Insurance with a deductible. DAUG bears the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then absorbs the next 25 points of losses, and in exchange your upside is capped at a level reset every August. Running since 2019.
PSCQ A deep buffer with a deductible: you take the first 5% of an S&P 500 slide, then the next 25 points get cushioned, up to a cap reset each October. At 0.49% a year, it is a low-cost way to run that trade.
Stated mandate
DAUG The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses, subject to an 11.98% upside cap and protection for losses in the -5% to -30% range during the current outcome period.
PSCQ The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust before fees and expenses up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over approximately one year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DAUG vs PSCQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DAUG vs PSCQ Cost
Overpaying DAUG vs PSCQ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DAUG 0.85%
$16,199
PSCQ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DAUG | PSCQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%DAUG
- 0.49%PSCQ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCQ 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
DAUG 8th cheapest of 19 funds
DAUG vs PSCQ Dividends
- DAUG None
- PSCQ None
Distribution history
DAUG vs PSCQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DAUG
- PSCQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DAUG 6.2%PSCQ 6.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DAUG 1.33, betterPSCQ 1.30
- Worst fall
- DAUG −15.3%PSCQ −9.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DAUG 0.53PSCQ 0.40
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.