Skip to content

DDXX vs PTBD

Defined Duration 20 ETF

DDXXBCboe

Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

PTBDANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DDXX −0.35pt a year

DDXX0.25%PTBD0.60%

Avg volume · 30D

PTBD 8.0×the volume

DDXX2.31KPTBD18.6K

DDXX vs PTBD Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DDXX−0.4%PTBD

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DDXX +11.2%. PTBD −0.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DDXX 0.25%, better
PTBD 0.60%
Fund size
DDXX $21M
PTBD $83M
1Y total return
DDXX No data
PTBD −0.1%
Yield (12M)
DDXX No data
PTBD 6.36%
Holdings
DDXX 12
PTBD 1047
Avg volume (30D)
DDXX 2.31K sh
PTBD 18.6K sh, better
NAV per share
DDXX $28.07
PTBD $18.34
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDXX: Cost 98, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 55, Durability 20. PTBD: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 50, Holdings 90, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDXX, PTBD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDXXPTBD
Cost30% weightA98HigherA83
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53B60Higher
Tradability15% weightD26C50Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A90Higher
Durability5% weightF20A83Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDXX and PTBD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

PTBD ranks 3rd and DDXX 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4ARISNInspire Capital Appreciation ETFScore 71
  5. Rank 7BTUGSTF Tactical Growth ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63
  7. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDXXBDefined Duration 20 ETF

PTBDAPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

In short

DDXX No data

PTBD Trend following, pointed at bonds instead of stocks. A published rulebook shifts PTBD between high yield corporates and intermediate Treasuries as their relative strength changes, dialing credit risk up or down by formula rather than by opinion.

Stated mandate

DDXX No data

PTBD The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index through a rules-based strategy that alternates between high-yield corporate bonds and U.S. Treasury bonds.

Why people hold it

DDXX No data

  • PTBD The rulebook is public and mechanical: high yield measured against Treasuries, compared to its 100-day average, with five straight closes needed to confirm. No manager hunch involved.paceretfs.com
  • 0.60% a year, comfortably below the median for tactical multi-asset funds. Cheap for a strategy that does the reallocating for you.
  • Holds roughly 1,000 bonds in whichever sleeve the signal points to, so no single issuer carries much weight. Income is distributed monthly.
  • Trading since 2019, long enough to have run the rules through a rate shock and a credit wobble, and it sits in the upper tier of the tactical funds we cover.

Worth knowing

DDXX No data

  • PTBD Trend rules react, they don't anticipate. A sharp reversal can flip the signal after the move has happened, and the confirmation window means the switch lands days later.paceretfs.com
  • In its risk-on position the portfolio is high yield corporate debt, full stop. That is credit risk, a different animal from Treasury rate risk.paceretfs.com
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so the spread and a limit order matter more here than with a mega-fund.

Full DDXX profile⁠

Full PTBD profile⁠

DDXX vs PTBD Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDXX vs PTBD Cost

Overpaying PTBD vs DDXX

$6,658

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDXX 0.25%

    $5,159

  • PTBD 0.60%

    $11,817

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDXX 0.25%
  • PTBD 0.60%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTBD $11,817DDXX $5,159

Year by year

YearDDXXPTBDOverpaying
10$455$1,076$621
20$1,769$4,116$2,347
30$5,159$11,817$6,658

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%DDXX, cheaper
  • 0.60%PTBD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

DDXX 2nd cheapest of 46 funds

PTBD 8th cheapest of 46 funds

DDXX vs PTBD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DDXX No data
PTBD 6.36%
Payout (12M)
DDXX No data
PTBD $1.17
Last payment
DDXX $0.05
PTBD $0.10
Ex-dividend
DDXX Sep 28, 2026
PTBD Oct 22, 2026
Paid on
DDXX Sep 30, 2026
PTBD Oct 26, 2026
Frequency
DDXX Quarterly
PTBD Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

DDXXQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll DDXX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.30; Mar 30, 2026 $0.02; Jun 29, 2026 $0.18; Sep 28, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
PTBDMonthly · 46 paymentsAll PTBD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jan 26, 2023 $0.09; Feb 23, 2023 $0.11; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Apr 27, 2023 $0.07; May 25, 2023 $0.04; Jun 22, 2023 $0.09; Jul 27, 2023 $0.16; Aug 24, 2023 $0.12; Sep 21, 2023 $0.12; Oct 26, 2023 $0.14; Nov 22, 2023 $0.11; Dec 27, 2023 $0.17; Jan 25, 2024 $0.09; Feb 22, 2024 $0.11; Mar 21, 2024 $0.12; Apr 25, 2024 $0.14; May 23, 2024 $0.09; Jun 27, 2024 $0.18; Jul 25, 2024 $0.11; Aug 22, 2024 $0.09; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Oct 24, 2024 $0.08; Nov 21, 2024 $0.10; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Jan 23, 2025 $0.07; Feb 26, 2025 $0.12; Mar 27, 2025 $0.10; Apr 24, 2025 $0.03; May 22, 2025 $0.04; Jun 26, 2025 $0.12; Jul 24, 2025 $0.10; Aug 27, 2025 $0.12; Sep 25, 2025 $0.09; Oct 23, 2025 $0.09; Nov 25, 2025 $0.06; Dec 23, 2025 $0.15; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Feb 25, 2026 $0.11; Mar 26, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; May 21, 2026 $0.07; Jun 25, 2026 $0.12; Jul 23, 2026 $0.10; Aug 27, 2026 $0.15; Sep 24, 2026 $0.09; Oct 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

DDXX vs PTBD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDXX No dataPTBD 5.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDXX No dataPTBD 0.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDXX No dataPTBD −24.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDXX 0.79PTBD 0.74

Popular comparisons

  • DDXXBvsENDWA

    Defined Duration 20 ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsENDWA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDXXBvsGMODA

    Defined Duration 20 ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsGMODA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDXXBvsRISNA

    Defined Duration 20 ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTBDAvsRISNA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.