Skip to content

DDXX vs GMOD

Defined Duration 20 ETF

DDXXBCboe

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

DDXX −0.25pt a year

DDXX0.25%GMOD0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

GMOD 5.1×the volume

DDXX2.31KGMOD11.8K

DDXX vs GMOD Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.2%DDXX+8.9%GMOD

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DDXX +11.2%. GMOD +8.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DDXX 0.25%, better
GMOD 0.50%
Fund size
DDXX $21M
GMOD $49M
1Y total return
DDXX No data
GMOD +11.8%
Holdings
DDXX 12
GMOD 20
Avg volume (30D)
DDXX 2.31K sh
GMOD 11.8K sh, better
NAV per share
DDXX $28.07
GMOD $27.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DDXX: Cost 98, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 55, Durability 20. GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for DDXX, GMOD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDDXXGMOD
Cost30% weightA98HigherA90
Mission25% weightNot scoredA74
Risk15% weightC53A75Higher
Tradability15% weightD26A73Higher
Holdings10% weightB55B64Higher
Durability5% weightF20C49Higher

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DDXX and GMOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

GMOD ranks 2nd and DDXX 9th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 7BTUGSTF Tactical Growth ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 9BDDXXDefined Duration 20 ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 9BMATRHarbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETFScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DDXXBDefined Duration 20 ETF

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

In short

DDXX No data

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

Stated mandate

DDXX No data

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

Why people hold it

DDXX No data

  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.

Worth knowing

DDXX No data

  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.

Full DDXX profile⁠

Full GMOD profile⁠

DDXX vs GMOD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DDXX vs GMOD Cost

Overpaying GMOD vs DDXX

$4,820

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DDXX 0.25%

    $5,159

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DDXX 0.25%
  • GMOD 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GMOD $9,979DDXX $5,159

Year by year

YearDDXXGMODOverpaying
10$455$900$445
20$1,769$3,460$1,691
30$5,159$9,979$4,820

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%DDXX, cheaper
  • 0.50%GMOD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

DDXX 2nd cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

DDXX vs GMOD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Last payment
DDXX $0.05
GMOD $0.14
Ex-dividend
DDXX Sep 28, 2026
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
Paid on
DDXX Sep 30, 2026
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
Frequency
DDXX Quarterly
GMOD Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

DDXXQuarterly · 4 paymentsAll DDXX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.30; Mar 30, 2026 $0.02; Jun 29, 2026 $0.18; Sep 28, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

DDXX vs GMOD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DDXX No dataGMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DDXX No dataGMOD 0.89since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DDXX No dataGMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DDXX 0.79GMOD 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • DDXXBvsENDWA

    Defined Duration 20 ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsENDWA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Cambria Endowment Style ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.22%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDXXBvsPTBDA

    Defined Duration 20 ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DDXXBvsRISNA

    Defined Duration 20 ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.