DEM ranks 4th and EDOG 9th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Dividend Index Category.
DEM vs EDOG
EDOG −0.03pt a year
0.63%0.60%
DEM 30.2×the volume
231K7.64K
DEM +3.2pt
+8.6%+5.4%
DEM vs EDOG Performance
+59.3%+28.1%
- DEM 0.63%
- EDOG 0.60%, better
- DEM $3.98B
- EDOG $21M
- DEM +18.8%, better
- EDOG +6.2%
- DEM 3.40%
- EDOG 5.17%, better
- DEM 559
- EDOG 50
- DEM 231K sh, better
- EDOG 7.64K sh
- DEM $52.83
- EDOG $23.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DEM | EDOG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | D37Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | B55 |
| Risk | B66Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | B67Higher | D32 |
| Durability | A75Higher | C40 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DEM and EDOG are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DEMB
EDOGC
In short
DEM One of the original emerging-market dividend ETFs (2007). DEM ranks EM payers by yield, keeps only the top slice, then weights them by the actual dollars of dividends they pay. Income-first EM, not market-cap EM.
EDOG The Dogs of the Dow playbook, exported to emerging markets. EDOG's index hunts high-dividend stocks sector by sector rather than grabbing whatever corner of EM happens to yield most, then pays the income out quarterly.
Stated mandate
DEM The fund seeks to track high-dividend-yielding companies in emerging markets and provides targeted emerging-market all-cap equity exposure.
EDOG EDOG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S-Network Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs Index, which selects high-dividend stocks from emerging markets across sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DEM vs EDOG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DEM vs EDOG Cost
Overpaying DEM vs EDOG
$542
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DEM 0.63%
$12,359
EDOG 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DEM | EDOG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $1,076 | $52 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $4,116 | $195 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $11,817 | $542 |
- 0.63%DEM
- 0.60%EDOG, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.59%
EDOG 6th cheapest of 10 funds
DEM 8th cheapest of 10 funds
DEM vs EDOG Dividends
- DEM 3.40%
- EDOG 5.17%, better
- DEM $1.80
- EDOG $1.23
- DEM $0.77
- EDOG $0.31
- DEM Sep 25, 2026
- EDOG Sep 17, 2026
- DEM Sep 29, 2026
- EDOG Sep 22, 2026
- DEM Quarterly
- EDOG Quarterly
Distribution history
DEM vs EDOG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DEM
- EDOG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DEM 10.0%, betterEDOG 10.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DEM 1.29, betterEDOG 0.75
- Worst fall
- DEM −27.1%EDOG −26.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DEM 0.73EDOG 0.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.