DGRO ranks 1st and QDEF 32nd of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DGRO vs QDEF
DGRO −0.31pt a year
0.08%0.39%
DGRO 203.6×the volume
1.39M6.81K
DGRO +1.5pt
+14.1%+12.6%
DGRO vs QDEF Performance
+71.0%+79.3%
- DGRO 0.08%, better
- QDEF 0.39%
- DGRO $45.3B
- QDEF $551M
- DGRO +21.5%, better
- QDEF +15.1%
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- QDEF 1.57%
- DGRO 394
- QDEF 157
- DGRO 1.39M sh, better
- QDEF 6.81K sh
- DGRO $81.00
- QDEF $90.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRO | QDEF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A98Higher | B66 |
| Risk | A77Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A90Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | C44 |
| Durability | A87Higher | B57 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DGRO and QDEF are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGROA
QDEFC
In short
DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.
QDEF Most dividend funds screen for yield and hope the ride stays smooth. QDEF's index engineers it: quality and payout screens first, then a portfolio beta targeted at 0.5 to 1.0 times its Northern Trust parent index.
Stated mandate
DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.
QDEF The fund provides exposure to a high-quality, income-oriented portfolio of long-only U.S. equity securities, emphasizing long-term capital growth and a defensive beta relative to its parent index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRO vs QDEF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRO vs QDEF Cost
Overpaying QDEF vs DGRO
$6,209
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRO 0.08%
$1,689
QDEF 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRO | QDEF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $705 | $558 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,725 | $2,150 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,898 | $6,209 |
- 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
- 0.39%QDEF
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds
QDEF 32nd cheapest of 52 funds
DGRO vs QDEF Dividends
- DGRO 1.84%, better
- QDEF 1.57%
- DGRO $1.49
- QDEF $1.42
- DGRO $0.39
- QDEF $0.34
- DGRO Sep 15, 2026
- QDEF Sep 18, 2026
- DGRO Sep 18, 2026
- QDEF Sep 24, 2026
- DGRO Quarterly
- QDEF Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRO vs QDEF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRO
- QDEF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRO 10.8%QDEF 9.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRO 1.47QDEF 1.59, better
- Worst fall
- DGRO −19.3%, betterQDEF −21.4%
- Market sensitivity
- DGRO 0.67QDEF 0.83
DGRO and QDEF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





