DIVB ranks 3rd and SMDV 36th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DIVB vs SMDV
DIVB −0.35pt a year
0.05%0.40%
DIVB 2.8×the volume
298K108K
DIVB +8.6pt
+14.4%+5.8%
DIVB vs SMDV Performance
+96.0%+32.8%
- DIVB 0.05%, better
- SMDV 0.40%
- DIVB $2.31B
- SMDV $668M
- DIVB +41.1%, better
- SMDV +19.6%
- DIVB 2.07%
- SMDV 2.30%, better
- DIVB 384
- SMDV 71
- DIVB 298K sh, better
- SMDV 108K sh
- DIVB $71.28
- SMDV $74.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DIVB | SMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A86Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A74Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | B59 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B62 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DIVB and SMDV are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DIVBA
SMDVC
In short
DIVB Most dividend funds only count the check that hits your account. DIVB's index also counts buybacks, treating a shrinking share count as cash returned to owners, and it charges five basis points to do it.
SMDV Dividend-growth screens usually live in large-cap land. SMDV points one at the small-cap Russell 2000 instead, holding about 100 names selected for their dividend growth records, and it has run that way since 2015.
Stated mandate
DIVB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies selected for a history of dividend payments and/or share buybacks, providing equity exposure oriented toward income and long-term growth.
SMDV SMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DIVB vs SMDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DIVB vs SMDV Cost
Overpaying SMDV vs DIVB
$7,030
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DIVB 0.05%
$1,060
SMDV 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DIVB | SMDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $723 | $631 |
| 20 | $360 | $2,793 | $2,433 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $8,090 | $7,030 |
- 0.05%DIVB, cheaper
- 0.40%SMDV
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DIVB 2nd cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV 37th cheapest of 52 funds
DIVB vs SMDV Dividends
- DIVB 2.07%
- SMDV 2.30%, better
- DIVB $1.48
- SMDV $1.75
- DIVB $0.42
- SMDV $0.42
- DIVB Sep 15, 2026
- SMDV Sep 23, 2026
- DIVB Sep 18, 2026
- SMDV Sep 29, 2026
- DIVB Quarterly
- SMDV Quarterly
Distribution history
DIVB vs SMDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DIVB
- SMDV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DIVB 14.0%, betterSMDV 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DIVB 1.58, betterSMDV 0.58
- Worst fall
- DIVB −21.1%, betterSMDV −21.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DIVB 0.88SMDV 0.79
DIVB and SMDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
