SPYD ranks 4th and SMDV 36th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
SMDV vs SPYD
SPYD −0.33pt a year
0.40%0.07%
SPYD 9.3×the volume
108K1M
SPYD +1.7pt
+7.6%+9.3%
SMDV vs SPYD Performance
+32.8%+51.4%
- SMDV 0.40%
- SPYD 0.07%, better
- SMDV $668M
- SPYD $7.61B
- SMDV +19.6%
- SPYD +21.9%, better
- SMDV 2.30%
- SPYD 4.15%, better
- SMDV 71
- SPYD 81
- SMDV 108K sh
- SPYD 1M sh, better
- SMDV $74.31
- SPYD $48.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMDV | SPYD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A75 | A88Higher |
| Risk | F13 | C41Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | A71 | A73Higher |
| Durability | B62 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. SMDV and SPYD are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMDVC
SPYDA
In short
SMDV Dividend-growth screens usually live in large-cap land. SMDV points one at the small-cap Russell 2000 instead, holding about 100 names selected for their dividend growth records, and it has run that way since 2015.
SPYD Most dividend ETFs hunt for companies that keep raising payouts. SPYD skips the courtship and goes straight for the yield: roughly 80 high-dividend names out of the S&P 500, for 0.07% a year.
Stated mandate
SMDV SMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index.
SPYD The fund seeks to provide returns that generally correspond to the total return of the S&P 500 High Dividend Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMDV vs SPYD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMDV vs SPYD Cost
Overpaying SMDV vs SPYD
$6,610
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMDV 0.40%
$8,090
SPYD 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMDV | SPYD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $128 | $595 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $503 | $2,290 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,480 | $6,610 |
- 0.40%SMDV
- 0.07%SPYD, cheaper
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
SPYD 6th cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV 37th cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV vs SPYD Dividends
- SMDV 2.30%
- SPYD 4.15%, better
- SMDV $1.75
- SPYD $2.06
- SMDV $0.42
- SPYD $0.52
- SMDV Sep 23, 2026
- SPYD Sep 21, 2026
- SMDV Sep 29, 2026
- SPYD Sep 23, 2026
- SMDV Quarterly
- SPYD Quarterly
Distribution history
SMDV vs SPYD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SMDV
- SPYD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMDV 17.6%SPYD 14.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMDV 0.58SPYD 0.96, better
- Worst fall
- SMDV −21.2%, betterSPYD −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SMDV 0.79SPYD 0.64
SMDV and SPYD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

