DGRO ranks 1st and SMDV 36th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
DGRO vs SMDV
DGRO −0.32pt a year
0.08%0.40%
DGRO 12.8×the volume
1.39M108K
DGRO +6.7pt
+14.3%+7.6%
DGRO vs SMDV Performance
+70.2%+32.8%
- DGRO 0.08%, better
- SMDV 0.40%
- DGRO $45.3B
- SMDV $668M
- DGRO +21.8%, better
- SMDV +19.6%
- DGRO 1.84%
- SMDV 2.30%, better
- DGRO 394
- SMDV 71
- DGRO 1.39M sh, better
- SMDV 108K sh
- DGRO $81.00
- SMDV $74.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DGRO | SMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A77Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | B62 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A87Higher | B62 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. DGRO and SMDV are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DGROA
SMDVC
In short
DGRO BlackRock's dividend-growth screen casts a wider net than most: five straight years of raises rather than ten, plus a payout-ratio cap that filters out stretched payers. About 400 US dividend raisers, large through small cap, for 0.08% a year.
SMDV Dividend-growth screens usually live in large-cap land. SMDV points one at the small-cap Russell 2000 instead, holding about 100 names selected for their dividend growth records, and it has run that way since 2015.
Stated mandate
DGRO The fund seeks to follow an index of U.S. equities whose dividends have grown consistently.
SMDV SMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DGRO vs SMDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DGRO vs SMDV Cost
Overpaying SMDV vs DGRO
$6,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DGRO 0.08%
$1,689
SMDV 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DGRO | SMDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $723 | $576 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,793 | $2,218 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $8,090 | $6,401 |
- 0.08%DGRO, cheaper
- 0.40%SMDV
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
DGRO 8th cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV 37th cheapest of 52 funds
DGRO vs SMDV Dividends
- DGRO 1.84%
- SMDV 2.30%, better
- DGRO $1.49
- SMDV $1.75
- DGRO $0.39
- SMDV $0.42
- DGRO Sep 15, 2026
- SMDV Sep 23, 2026
- DGRO Sep 18, 2026
- SMDV Sep 29, 2026
- DGRO Quarterly
- SMDV Quarterly
Distribution history
DGRO vs SMDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DGRO
- SMDV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DGRO 10.8%, betterSMDV 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DGRO 1.47, betterSMDV 0.58
- Worst fall
- DGRO −19.3%, betterSMDV −21.2%
- Market sensitivity
- DGRO 0.67SMDV 0.79
DGRO and SMDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





