SCHD ranks 2nd and SMDV 36th of 52 funds in the US Dividend Index Category.
SCHD vs SMDV
SCHD −0.34pt a year
0.06%0.40%
SCHD 208.9×the volume
22.6M108K
SCHD +6.2pt
+13.8%+7.6%
SCHD vs SMDV Performance
+64.7%+32.8%
- SCHD 0.06%, better
- SMDV 0.40%
- SCHD $121B
- SMDV $668M
- SCHD +38.9%, better
- SMDV +19.6%
- SCHD 2.94%, better
- SMDV 2.30%
- SCHD 100
- SMDV 71
- SCHD 22.6M sh, better
- SMDV 108K sh
- SCHD $35.77
- SMDV $74.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHD | SMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | D36 |
| Mission | A84Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A71Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | D33 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | B62 |
Rank among US Dividend Index funds
Same Category. SCHD and SMDV are both graded against the same 52 US Dividend Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHDA
SMDVC
In short
SCHD The dividend fund that checks the balance sheet before it checks the yield. SCHD only considers companies with 10 straight years of payouts, then ranks the survivors on cash flow, return on equity and dividend growth. Quality gate first, income second, at six basis points.
SMDV Dividend-growth screens usually live in large-cap land. SMDV points one at the small-cap Russell 2000 instead, holding about 100 names selected for their dividend growth records, and it has run that way since 2015.
Stated mandate
SCHD The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100TM Index.
SMDV SMDV seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHD vs SMDV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHD vs SMDV Cost
Overpaying SMDV vs SCHD
$6,820
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHD 0.06%
$1,270
SMDV 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHD | SMDV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $723 | $613 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,793 | $2,361 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $8,090 | $6,820 |
- 0.06%SCHD, cheaper
- 0.40%SMDV
- Middle half of US Dividend Index funds
- Median 0.35%
SCHD 4th cheapest of 52 funds
SMDV 37th cheapest of 52 funds
SCHD vs SMDV Dividends
- SCHD 2.94%, better
- SMDV 2.30%
- SCHD $1.05
- SMDV $1.75
- SCHD $0.27
- SMDV $0.42
- SCHD Sep 23, 2026
- SMDV Sep 23, 2026
- SCHD Sep 28, 2026
- SMDV Sep 29, 2026
- SCHD Quarterly
- SMDV Quarterly
Distribution history
SCHD vs SMDV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SCHD
- SMDV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHD 14.3%, betterSMDV 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHD 1.08, betterSMDV 0.58
- Worst fall
- SCHD −16.8%, betterSMDV −21.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHD 0.58SMDV 0.79
SCHD and SMDV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





