DMXF ranks 3rd and LCTD 9th of 18 funds in the International ESG & Values Index Category.
DMXF vs LCTD
DMXF −0.10pt a year
0.12%0.22%
DMXF 5.1×the volume
75.7K15K
LCTD +0.5pt
+6.7%+7.2%
DMXF vs LCTD Performance
+38.6%+41.5%
- DMXF 0.12%, better
- LCTD 0.22%
- DMXF $1.04B
- LCTD $318M
- DMXF +14.0%, better
- LCTD +11.3%
- DMXF 4.22%, better
- LCTD 3.36%
- DMXF 408
- LCTD 352
- DMXF 75.7K sh, better
- LCTD 15K sh
- DMXF $83.48
- LCTD $58.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DMXF | LCTD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | B59 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D36 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | C45 | B66Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C49 |
Rank among International ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. DMXF and LCTD are both graded against the same 18 International ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DMXFA
LCTDB
In short
DMXF The strict one. Where iShares' ESG Aware EAFE fund screens five controversial businesses, DMXF screens fourteen, including the whole energy sector, and charges less than its lighter-screened sibling to do it.
LCTD Instead of banning fossil fuels, LCTD stays inside the MSCI World ex USA universe and tilts toward the companies BlackRock scores as readiest for the low-carbon shift. 0.22% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
DMXF The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada, while incorporating positive environmental, social, and governance characteristics.
LCTD The Fund seeks to outperform the MSCI World ex USA Index before expenses by applying BlackRock's proprietary Low Carbon Economy Transition Readiness score criteria.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DMXF vs LCTD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DMXF vs LCTD Cost
Overpaying LCTD vs DMXF
$2,038
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DMXF 0.12%
$2,520
LCTD 0.22%
$4,558
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DMXF | LCTD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $220 | $401 | $181 |
| 20 | $859 | $1,561 | $702 |
| 30 | $2,520 | $4,558 | $2,038 |
- 0.12%DMXF, cheaper
- 0.22%LCTD
- Middle half of International ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.23%
DMXF 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
LCTD 8th cheapest of 18 funds
DMXF vs LCTD Dividends
- DMXF 4.22%, better
- LCTD 3.36%
- DMXF $3.54
- LCTD $1.95
- DMXF $1.03
- LCTD $0.96
- DMXF Jun 15, 2026
- LCTD Jun 15, 2026
- DMXF Jun 18, 2026
- LCTD Jun 18, 2026
- DMXF Twice a year
- LCTD Twice a year
Distribution history
DMXF vs LCTD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DMXF
- LCTD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DMXF 12.8%LCTD 11.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DMXF 1.06LCTD 1.14, better
- Worst fall
- DMXF −33.7%LCTD −29.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DMXF 0.86LCTD 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.12% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.