DOG ranks 1st and SARK 15th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
DOG vs SARK
DOG −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
DOG 33.6×the volume
4.77M142K
DOG +26.1pt
−9.9%−36.0%
DOG vs SARK Performance
−4.9%−3.4%
- DOG 0.95%, better
- SARK 0.99%
- DOG $115M
- SARK $36M
- DOG −4.9%
- SARK −3.4%, better
- DOG 3.15%
- SARK 3.29%, better
- DOG 3
- SARK 2
- DOG 4.77M sh, better
- SARK 142K sh
- DOG $22.02
- SARK $25.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DOG | SARK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A97Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B65Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | C43 | |
| Durability | B69Higher | D39 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. DOG and SARK are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DOGB
SARKC
In short
DOG The plain-vanilla short on the Dow: DOG aims to deliver the inverse of the index's move each day, with no 2x or 3x bolted on. Running since 2006, and ProShares bills it as the only -1x ETF built on the Dow.
SARK The original anti-ARKK trade. Launched in 2021 as the first US ETF built to short another ETF, SARK uses swaps to aim for the inverse of the ARK Innovation ETF's move over a single day, then resets overnight. A trading tool, not a hold.
Stated mandate
DOG DOG seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Dow Jones Industrial Average's daily performance.
SARK The Fund seeks daily inverse exposure to the ARK Innovation ETF for one trading day, using swaps and daily repositioning. It is intended for sophisticated, actively managed trading or hedging strategies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DOG vs SARK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DOG vs SARK Cost
Overpaying SARK vs DOG
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DOG 0.95%
$17,869
SARK 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DOG | SARK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%DOG, cheaper
- 0.99%SARK
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
DOG 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SARK 49th cheapest of 53 funds
DOG vs SARK Dividends
- DOG 3.15%
- SARK 3.29%, better
- DOG $0.69
- SARK $0.85
- DOG $0.17
- SARK $0.85
- DOG Sep 23, 2026
- SARK Dec 23, 2025
- DOG Sep 29, 2026
- SARK Dec 26, 2025
- DOG Quarterly
- SARK Annual
Distribution history
DOG vs SARK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DOG 11.7%, betterSARK 46.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- DOG −1.21SARK −0.79, better
- Worst fall
- DOG −37.3%SARK −83.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DOG −0.83SARK −2.73
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.