PSQ ranks 3rd and SARK 15th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
PSQ vs SARK
0.0%by weight
PSQ −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
PSQ 91.5×the volume
13M142K
PSQ +18.3pt
−17.7%−36.0%
PSQ vs SARK Performance
−7.0%−3.4%
- PSQ 0.95%, better
- SARK 0.99%
- PSQ $611M
- SARK $36M
- PSQ −7.0%
- SARK −3.4%, better
- PSQ 3.90%, better
- SARK 3.29%
- PSQ 4
- SARK 2
- PSQ 13M sh, better
- SARK 142K sh
- PSQ $26.64
- SARK $25.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSQ | SARK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A98Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B59Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A98Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | D39 |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. PSQ and SARK are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSQB
SARKC
In short
PSQ The plain short on the Nasdaq-100: PSQ aims for -1x the index's daily move, with no leverage multiplier bolted on. It has been running since 2006, making it one of the original one-for-one bear tools.
SARK The original anti-ARKK trade. Launched in 2021 as the first US ETF built to short another ETF, SARK uses swaps to aim for the inverse of the ARK Innovation ETF's move over a single day, then resets overnight. A trading tool, not a hold.
Stated mandate
PSQ The fund is designed to provide -1x exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index's daily price movement, seeking to benefit when that index declines.
SARK The Fund seeks daily inverse exposure to the ARK Innovation ETF for one trading day, using swaps and daily repositioning. It is intended for sophisticated, actively managed trading or hedging strategies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSQ vs SARK Holdings
How PSQ and SARK differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of PSQ and 0.0% of SARK.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for SARK.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for SARK.
Concentration
- PSQ115.2%
- SARK105.6%
- PSQ4
- SARK2
Asset class
- PSQ
- Equity
- SARK
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in PSQ4
- In both0
- Only in SARK2
Only in PSQ
4 securities, 100% of PSQ by weight
- Proshares Genius Mny Mkt Etf74.06%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-1017.97%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-12-2917.93%
- TREASURY BILL, 0%, due 2026-11-175.25%
Only in SARK
2 securities, 100% of SARK by weight
- Cashusd100.22%
- Cfd Ark Innovation Etf5.40%
Weight gaps
PSQ and SARK share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSQ vs SARK Cost
Overpaying SARK vs PSQ
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSQ 0.95%
$17,869
SARK 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSQ | SARK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%PSQ, cheaper
- 0.99%SARK
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
PSQ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
SARK 49th cheapest of 53 funds
PSQ vs SARK Dividends
- PSQ 3.90%, better
- SARK 3.29%
- PSQ $1.04
- SARK $0.85
- PSQ $0.26
- SARK $0.85
- PSQ Sep 23, 2026
- SARK Dec 23, 2025
- PSQ Sep 29, 2026
- SARK Dec 26, 2025
- PSQ Quarterly
- SARK Annual
Distribution history
PSQ vs SARK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSQ 16.8%, betterSARK 46.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSQ −1.33SARK −0.79, better
- Worst fall
- PSQ −61.5%SARK −83.5%
- Market sensitivity
- PSQ −1.18SARK −2.73
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.