SARK ranks 15th and QQQD 21st of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs SARK
QQQD −0.49pt a year
0.50%0.99%
SARK 2.1×the volume
68.1K142K
QQQD vs SARK Performance
−0.7%−3.4%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- SARK 0.99%
- QQQD $28M
- SARK $36M
- QQQD −0.7%, better
- SARK −3.4%
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SARK 3.29%
- QQQD 3
- SARK 2
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- SARK 142K sh, better
- QQQD $12.18
- SARK $25.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | SARK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | B67Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | C43 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | D39Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and SARK are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
SARKC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
SARK The original anti-ARKK trade. Launched in 2021 as the first US ETF built to short another ETF, SARK uses swaps to aim for the inverse of the ARK Innovation ETF's move over a single day, then resets overnight. A trading tool, not a hold.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
SARK The Fund seeks daily inverse exposure to the ARK Innovation ETF for one trading day, using swaps and daily repositioning. It is intended for sophisticated, actively managed trading or hedging strategies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs SARK Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs SARK Cost
Overpaying SARK vs QQQD
$8,546
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
SARK 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | SARK | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,746 | $846 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,565 | $3,105 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $18,525 | $8,546 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.99%SARK
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
SARK 49th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs SARK Dividends
- QQQD 3.35%, better
- SARK 3.29%
- QQQD $0.41
- SARK $0.85
- QQQD $0.10
- SARK $0.85
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- SARK Dec 23, 2025
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- SARK Dec 26, 2025
- QQQD Quarterly
- SARK Annual
Distribution history
QQQD vs SARK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%SARK 46.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14SARK −0.79
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%SARK −83.5%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35SARK −2.73
QQQD and SARK in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
