FAS ranks 3rd and DRN 18th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
DRN vs FAS
FAS −0.10pt a year
0.98%0.88%
DRN 3.1×the volume
1.26M413K
FAS +25.5pt
−4.6%+20.9%
DRN vs FAS Performance
−57.1%+31.4%
- DRN 0.98%
- FAS 0.88%, better
- DRN $43M
- FAS $2.17B
- DRN +11.3%
- FAS +12.3%, better
- DRN 2.34%
- FAS 8.87%, better
- DRN 35
- FAS 87
- DRN 1.26M sh, better
- FAS 413K sh
- DRN $9.51
- FAS $168.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DRN | FAS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C44 | B66Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. DRN and FAS are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DRNC
FASA
In short
DRN Leveraged trading tools cluster around tech and banks. DRN has run 3x daily exposure to the S&P 500's real estate sector since 2009, a rare lever on landlords, malls and data centers.
FAS Born in November 2008 with the banking system on fire, FAS aims to deliver three times the daily move of the Financial Select Sector Index. A one-day tool on roughly 80 financial stocks, built around a single-day objective.
Stated mandate
DRN The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the Real Estate Select Sector Index.
FAS The fund seeks a daily return equal to three times the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single-day objective rather than a multiple of the index’s cumulative return over longer periods.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DRN vs FAS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DRN vs FAS Cost
Overpaying DRN vs FAS
$1,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DRN 0.98%
$18,362
FAS 0.88%
$16,705
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DRN | FAS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,559 | $170 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $5,891 | $613 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $16,705 | $1,657 |
- 0.98%DRN
- 0.88%FAS, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
FAS 4th cheapest of 30 funds
DRN 18th cheapest of 30 funds
DRN vs FAS Dividends
- DRN 2.34%
- FAS 8.87%, better
- DRN $0.22
- FAS $14.62
- DRN $0.07
- FAS $1.00
- DRN Sep 22, 2026
- FAS Sep 22, 2026
- DRN Sep 29, 2026
- FAS Sep 29, 2026
- DRN Quarterly
- FAS Quarterly
Distribution history
DRN vs FAS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- DRN
- FAS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DRN 50.3%FAS 46.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- DRN 0.50FAS 1.03, better
- Worst fall
- DRN −80.6%FAS −66.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- DRN 2.62FAS 2.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.