TLT ranks 4th and DWWN 11th of 11 funds in the Treasuries (20+ Year) Category.
DWWN vs TLT
TLT −0.04pt a year
0.19%0.15%
TLT 235179.0×the volume
14834.8M
DWWN vs TLT Performance
+1.1%+0.7%
- DWWN 0.19%
- TLT 0.15%, better
- DWWN $11M
- TLT $47.5B
- DWWN
- TLT −5.1%
- DWWN
- TLT 4.75%
- DWWN 57
- TLT 49
- DWWN 148 sh
- TLT 34.8M sh, better
- DWWN $24.12
- TLT $81.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DWWN | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | D37Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D35 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | F11 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B64 |
| Durability | F12 | A89Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
Same Category. DWWN and TLT are both graded against the same 11 Treasuries (20+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DWWND
TLTB
In short
TLT The long bond's most famous ticker. iShares launched TLT in 2002, and it became the default way to take a view on 20-year-plus Treasuries: index-tracked, heavily traded, with a deep listed options market.
Stated mandate
TLT The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury bonds with remaining maturities greater than twenty years, providing targeted exposure to long-duration government debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DWWN vs TLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DWWN vs TLT Cost
Overpaying DWWN vs TLT
$815
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DWWN 0.19%
$3,952
TLT 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DWWN | TLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $274 | $73 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $1,071 | $280 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $3,137 | $815 |
- 0.19%DWWN
- 0.15%TLT, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
TLT 6th cheapest of 11 funds
DWWN 10th cheapest of 11 funds
DWWN vs TLT Dividends
- DWWN
- TLT 4.75%
- DWWN
- TLT $3.89
- DWWN $0.10
- TLT $0.31
- DWWN Oct 1, 2026
- TLT Oct 1, 2026
- DWWN Oct 5, 2026
- TLT Oct 6, 2026
- DWWN Monthly
- TLT Monthly
Distribution history
DWWN vs TLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DWWN TLT 13.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- DWWN TLT −0.002
- Worst fall
- DWWN TLT −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- DWWN 0.46TLT 2.40
DWWN and TLT in the news

Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses





Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.