Skip to content

EAFG vs QLVD

Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

EAFGDNYSE Arca

Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVDANYSE Arca

Overlap

11.4%by weight

Expense ratio

QLVD −0.53pt a year

EAFG0.65%QLVD0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

QLVD 6.0×the volume

EAFG293QLVD1.77K

EAFG vs QLVD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.1%EAFG+16.4%QLVD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EAFG +13.1%. QLVD +16.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EAFG 0.65%
QLVD 0.12%, better
Fund size
EAFG $2M
QLVD $54M
1Y total return
EAFG +13.1%
QLVD +16.4%, better
Yield (12M)
EAFG 2.02%
QLVD 2.98%, better
Holdings
EAFG 108
QLVD 197
Avg volume (30D)
EAFG 293 sh
QLVD 1.77K sh, better
NAV per share
EAFG $25.60
QLVD $34.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EAFG: Cost 23, Risk 25, Mission not scored, Tradability 17, Holdings 44, Durability 30. QLVD: Cost 88, Risk 78, Mission 72, Tradability 41, Holdings 71, Durability 44.
Pillar letters and Scores for EAFG, QLVD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEAFGQLVD
Cost30% weightF23A88Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA72
Risk15% weightD25A78Higher
Tradability15% weightF17C41Higher
Holdings10% weightC44A71Higher
Durability5% weightD30C44Higher

Rank among International Quality Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EAFG and QLVD are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 6 ›

QLVD ranks 1st and EAFG 6th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AQLVDNorthern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 71
  2. Rank 2BIDHQInvesco S&P International Developed Quality ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 5CFICSFirst Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETFScore 45
  4. Rank 6DEAFGPacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETFScore 25

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EAFGDPacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

QLVDANorthern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

EAFG Pacer's Cash Cows playbook sent overseas with a growth tilt: developed-market large and mid caps screened on free cash flow, growth, momentum and profitability. A 2024 arrival in an aisle long ruled by min-vol veterans.

QLVD A defensive route into developed markets outside the US: drop the weakest quality quintile first, then build the low-volatility portfolio with limits on sector and country drift. Fee is 0.12%, net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

EAFG The fund seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Its strategy targets developed-markets large- and mid-capitalization companies using free cash flow and growth-oriented screening.

QLVD The fund is designed to provide exposure to developed-market companies outside the United States that have lower absolute volatility and financial strength and stability, the characteristics the issuer associates with quality.

Why people hold it

  • EAFG Screens developed large and mid caps on free cash flow, then leans growth, momentum and profitability. A cash-generation lens in a corner of the market that mostly sells low volatility.paceretfs.com
  • Rules-based and readable: it tracks the Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index, holds roughly 110 stocks, and pays quarterly inside a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper.paceretfs.com
  • Sits apart from shelf-mates like EFAV, ACWV and QLVD, which tilt toward low volatility and quality. EAFG starts from cash generation and growth instead.
  • QLVD Cheapest in its peer group at 0.12% (net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, against a 0.15% gross fee), versus 0.30% for IQLT, 0.29% for IDHQ and 0.27% for DIHP, none of which are running a waiver.
  • Quality is the gate, not a tilt: companies are scored on profitability, management efficiency and cash flow, and the bottom quintile is cut before the low-volatility portfolio gets built.flexshares.com
  • The index caps how far it can wander from the broad market on sectors, industry groups, countries and regions, and strips out style bets other than volatility. A check on the pileups plain low-vol screens can create.flexshares.com
  • Roughly 200 large and mid-cap names across developed markets, rebuilt on a quarterly schedule, and one of the stronger implementations among the international quality funds we grade. Pays quarterly.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • EAFG Charges 0.65% a year, above what the typical developed-markets factor fund costs. The screen carries a higher toll than an index-hugging alternative.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Spreads can run wider and less predictable than in the giant developed-markets index products.
  • Launched in 2024, so the track record is short: no full market cycle yet to show how a cash-flow-plus-growth screen behaves overseas.
  • QLVD Thinly traded for its category, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the category's heavyweights and bigger orders may take more work to fill.
  • The 0.12% is net of a waiver dated to March 1, 2027; the gross fee is 0.15%, so cost can step up if that waiver is not renewed.
  • Modest asset base by category standards, and the fund holds a representative sample rather than every index name, which can open small gaps against the index.flexshares.com

Full EAFG profile⁠

Full QLVD profile⁠

EAFG vs QLVD Holdings

As of

How EAFG and QLVD differ

Overlap by weight

11.4%

Shared holdings make up 21.8% of EAFG and 19.9% of QLVD.

Level by level

  • Holdings28 in both11.4%
  • Sector11 Sectors55.2%
  • Countryby domicile64.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in EAFG and QLVD, widest gap first
SectorMore in EAFGMore in QLVD
FinancialsQLVD +23.2 points
TechnologyEAFG +19.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryEAFG +12.4 points
CommunicationEAFG +9.1 points
Consumer StaplesQLVD +8.4 points
UtilitiesQLVD +6.5 points
Real EstateQLVD +4.2 points
EnergyQLVD +2.5 points
MaterialsEAFG +2.2 points
Health CareEAFG +1.2 points
IndustrialsEAFG +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EAFG and QLVD, widest gap first
CountryMore in EAFGMore in QLVD
CanadaQLVD +15.3 points
AustraliaEAFG +9.6 points
JapanEAFG +8.7 points
DenmarkEAFG +6.2 points
SwitzerlandQLVD +5.3 points
SingaporeQLVD +5.2 points
SwedenEAFG +4.0 points
GermanyQLVD +3.3 points
Other countries (15)EAFG +0.6 points

Outside the US: EAFG 99% developed, 1% emerging. QLVD 98% developed, 2% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EAFG27.2%
  • QLVD22.0%

Securities held

  • EAFG103
  • QLVD180

Asset class

EAFG
Equity
QLVD
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EAFG75
  • In both28
  • Only in QLVD152

Only in EAFG

75 securities, 77.7% of EAFG by weight

  • Recruit Holdings Co Ltd4.39%
  • Ibiden Co Ltd3.51%
  • Pandora A/S2.99%

Only in QLVD

152 securities, 78.6% of QLVD by weight

  • Royal Bank of Canada Common Stock Cad 03.57%
  • Unilever PLC Common Stock Gbp 0.0311112.23%
  • Dbs Group Holdings Ltd Common Stock Sgd 01.89%

Weight gaps

All 28 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EAFG and QLVD, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EAFGMore in QLVD
Novartis AGQLVD +3.70 points
LY CorpEAFG +1.75 points
Sage Group PLC/TheSGE.LEAFG +1.75 points
Sanofi SAQLVD +1.06 points
Obic Co LtdEAFG +1.01 points
BHP Group LtdEAFG +0.92 points
ASML Holding NVQLVD +0.86 points
Deutsche Telekom AGQLVD +0.76 points

All 112 EAFG holdings⁠All 214 QLVD holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EAFG vs QLVD Cost

Overpaying EAFG vs QLVD

$10,197

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EAFG 0.65%

    $12,717

  • QLVD 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EAFG 0.65%
  • QLVD 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530EAFG $12,717QLVD $2,520

Year by year

YearEAFGQLVDOverpaying
10$1,163$220$943
20$4,440$859$3,581
30$12,717$2,520$10,197

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%EAFG
  • 0.12%QLVD, cheaper
  • Middle half of International Quality Index funds
  • Median 0.29%

QLVD cheapest of 6 funds

EAFG 5th cheapest of 6 funds

EAFG vs QLVD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EAFG 2.02%
QLVD 2.98%, better
Payout (12M)
EAFG $0.51
QLVD $1.03
Last payment
EAFG $0.03
QLVD $0.19
Ex-dividend
EAFG Sep 3, 2026
QLVD Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
EAFG Sep 8, 2026
QLVD Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
EAFG Quarterly
QLVD Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

EAFGQuarterly · 9 paymentsAll EAFG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 26, 2024 $0.06; Dec 27, 2024 $0.18; Jun 5, 2025 $0.04; Sep 4, 2025 $0.03; Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Mar 5, 2026 $0.01; Jun 4, 2026 $0.23; Sep 3, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
QLVDQuarterly · 29 paymentsAll QLVD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 29 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.09; Dec 20, 2019 $0.19; Mar 20, 2020 $0.04; Jun 19, 2020 $0.19; Sep 18, 2020 $0.12; Dec 18, 2020 $0.12; Mar 19, 2021 $0.10; Jun 18, 2021 $0.34; Sep 17, 2021 $0.15; Dec 17, 2021 $0.26; Mar 18, 2022 $0.05; Jun 17, 2022 $0.35; Sep 16, 2022 $0.11; Dec 16, 2022 $0.08; Mar 17, 2023 $0.07; Jun 16, 2023 $0.44; Sep 15, 2023 $0.11; Dec 15, 2023 $0.24; Mar 15, 2024 $0.03; Jun 21, 2024 $0.45; Sep 20, 2024 $0.13; Dec 20, 2024 $0.19; Mar 21, 2025 $0.06; Jun 20, 2025 $0.41; Sep 19, 2025 $0.16; Dec 19, 2025 $0.28; Mar 20, 2026 $0.05; Jun 18, 2026 $0.51; Sep 18, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

EAFG vs QLVD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EAFG 15.6%since Apr 2024QLVD 11.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EAFG 0.47since Apr 2024QLVD 1.08
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EAFG −16.5%since Mar 2024QLVD −23.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EAFG 0.92QLVD 0.64

Popular comparisons

  • EAFGDvsIDHQB

    Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVDAvsIDHQB

    Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EAFGDvsDIHPB

    Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF · Dimensional International High Profitability ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.27%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVDAvsDIHPB

    Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF · Dimensional International High Profitability ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.27%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EAFGDvsIQLTB

    Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF · iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVDAvsIQLTB

    Northern Trust Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility ETF · iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.