IDHQ ranks 2nd and EAFG 6th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.
EAFG vs IDHQ
IDHQ −0.36pt a year
0.65%0.29%
IDHQ 633.4×the volume
293186K
EAFG vs IDHQ Performance
+13.1%+30.6%
- EAFG 0.65%
- IDHQ 0.29%, better
- EAFG $2M
- IDHQ $1.22B
- EAFG +13.1%
- IDHQ +30.6%, better
- EAFG 2.02%, better
- IDHQ 1.93%
- EAFG 108
- IDHQ 191
- EAFG 293 sh
- IDHQ 186K sh, better
- EAFG $25.60
- IDHQ $43.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EAFG | IDHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | B64Higher |
| Mission | A88 | |
| Risk | D25 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | F17 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | C44Higher | D39 |
| Durability | D30 | A75Higher |
Rank among International Quality Index funds
Same Category. EAFG and IDHQ are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EAFGD
IDHQB
In short
EAFG Pacer's Cash Cows playbook sent overseas with a growth tilt: developed-market large and mid caps screened on free cash flow, growth, momentum and profitability. A 2024 arrival in an aisle long ruled by min-vol veterans.
IDHQ One of the longest-running international quality funds: since 2007 it has held the developed ex-US names scoring highest on return on equity, accruals and leverage, for a fee below the typical international-factor rate.
Stated mandate
EAFG The fund seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Its strategy targets developed-markets large- and mid-capitalization companies using free cash flow and growth-oriented screening.
IDHQ The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the S&P Quality Developed ex-U.S. LargeMidCap Index. It uses an index-based strategy focused on international developed-market equities selected for quality.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EAFG vs IDHQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EAFG vs IDHQ Cost
Overpaying EAFG vs IDHQ
$6,765
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EAFG 0.65%
$12,717
IDHQ 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EAFG | IDHQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $527 | $636 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,044 | $2,396 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $5,952 | $6,765 |
- 0.65%EAFG
- 0.29%IDHQ, cheaper
- Middle half of International Quality Index funds
- Median 0.29%
IDHQ 3rd cheapest of 6 funds
EAFG 5th cheapest of 6 funds
EAFG vs IDHQ Dividends
- EAFG 2.02%, better
- IDHQ 1.93%
- EAFG $0.51
- IDHQ $0.85
- EAFG $0.03
- IDHQ $0.12
- EAFG Sep 3, 2026
- IDHQ Sep 21, 2026
- EAFG Sep 8, 2026
- IDHQ Sep 25, 2026
- EAFG Quarterly
- IDHQ Quarterly
Distribution history
EAFG vs IDHQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EAFG 15.6%IDHQ 14.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EAFG 0.47IDHQ 1.18
- Worst fall
- EAFG −16.5%IDHQ −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EAFG 0.92IDHQ 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.