IQLT ranks 4th and EAFG 6th of 6 funds in the International Quality Index Category.
EAFG vs IQLT
IQLT −0.35pt a year
0.65%0.30%
IQLT 5020.7×the volume
2931.47M
EAFG vs IQLT Performance
+13.1%+16.0%
- EAFG 0.65%
- IQLT 0.30%, better
- EAFG $2M
- IQLT $13.7B
- EAFG +13.1%
- IQLT +16.0%, better
- EAFG 2.02%
- IQLT 2.37%, better
- EAFG 108
- IQLT 308
- EAFG 293 sh
- IQLT 1.47M sh, better
- EAFG $25.60
- IQLT $50.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EAFG | IQLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | C44Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D25 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | F17 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | B62Higher |
| Durability | D30 | A86Higher |
Rank among International Quality Index funds
Same Category. EAFG and IQLT are both graded against the same 6 International Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EAFGD
IQLTB
In short
EAFG Pacer's Cash Cows playbook sent overseas with a growth tilt: developed-market large and mid caps screened on free cash flow, growth, momentum and profitability. A 2024 arrival in an aisle long ruled by min-vol veterans.
IQLT Quality investing abroad, with the sector bets stripped out. IQLT holds developed-market companies picked for high return on equity, stable earnings and low debt, while keeping sector weights close to the broad market.
Stated mandate
EAFG The fund seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Developed Markets Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. Its strategy targets developed-markets large- and mid-capitalization companies using free cash flow and growth-oriented screening.
IQLT The fund seeks to track an index of international developed-market stocks selected for high return on equity, stable earnings, and low debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EAFG vs IQLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EAFG vs IQLT Cost
Overpaying EAFG vs IQLT
$6,568
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EAFG 0.65%
$12,717
IQLT 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EAFG | IQLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $545 | $618 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $2,113 | $2,327 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $6,149 | $6,568 |
- 0.65%EAFG
- 0.30%IQLT, cheaper
- Middle half of International Quality Index funds
- Median 0.29%
IQLT 4th cheapest of 6 funds
EAFG 5th cheapest of 6 funds
EAFG vs IQLT Dividends
- EAFG 2.02%
- IQLT 2.37%, better
- EAFG $0.51
- IQLT $1.20
- EAFG $0.03
- IQLT $0.75
- EAFG Sep 3, 2026
- IQLT Jun 15, 2026
- EAFG Sep 8, 2026
- IQLT Jun 18, 2026
- EAFG Quarterly
- IQLT Twice a year
Distribution history
EAFG vs IQLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EAFG 15.6%IQLT 12.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EAFG 0.47IQLT 1.08
- Worst fall
- EAFG −16.5%IQLT −29.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EAFG 0.92IQLT 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.27%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.