EBUF ranks 1st and EJAN 2nd of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.
EBUF vs EJAN
0.2%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.89%0.89%
EBUF 1.3×the volume
17.6K13.2K
EBUF vs EJAN Performance
+7.7%+8.8%
- EBUF 0.89%
- EJAN 0.89%
- EBUF $46M
- EJAN $141M
- EBUF +7.7%
- EJAN +8.8%, better
- EBUF 3
- EJAN 3
- EBUF 17.6K sh, better
- EJAN 13.2K sh
- EBUF $30.58
- EJAN $36.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EBUF | EJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | C47 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A82Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | A72 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76 | A87Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Same Category. EBUF and EJAN are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EBUFB
EJANB
In short
EBUF Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EBUF points the same machinery at emerging markets: MSCI EM exposure in roughly three-month stretches, with a 10% downside buffer and an upside cap reset at the start of each period.
EJAN Buffer ETFs almost all point at the S&P 500. EJAN aims the same machinery at emerging markets: EEM exposure with the first 15% of losses absorbed over a 12-month outcome period that restarts every January, in exchange for a cap reset each year.
Stated mandate
EBUF The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over each approximately three-month period, subject to a maximum upside return and a 10% downside buffer.
EJAN The fund seeks to track the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), subject to a predetermined upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EBUF vs EJAN Holdings
How EBUF and EJAN differ
0.2%
Shared holdings make up 3.6% of EBUF and 0.2% of EJAN.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.2%
Sector
| Sector | More in EBUFMore in EJAN | EBUF | EJAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 44.2% | 44.2% |
| Financials | Same weight | 19.2% | 19.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 7.5% | 7.5% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Communication | Same weight | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Materials | Same weight | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 0.9% | 0.9% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in EBUFMore in EJAN | EBUF | EJAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | Same weight | 30.6% | 30.6% |
| South Korea | Same weight | 21.2% | 21.2% |
| China | Same weight | 19.6% | 19.6% |
| India | Same weight | 11.8% | 11.8% |
| Brazil | Same weight | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| South Africa | Same weight | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Poland | Same weight | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Other countries (10) | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Outside the US: EBUF 1% developed, 99% emerging. EJAN 1% developed, 99% emerging.
Concentration
- EBUF107.4%
- EJAN103.6%
- EBUF3
- EJAN3
Asset class
- EBUF
- Alternatives
- EJAN
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in EBUF2
- In both1
- Only in EJAN2
Only in EBUF
2 securities, 100% of EBUF by weight
- Eem 12/31/2026 0.17 C93.64%
- Eem 12/31/2026 66.79 P10.17%
Only in EJAN
2 securities, 100% of EJAN by weight
- Eem 12/31/2026 0.55 C101.79%
- Eem 12/31/2026 54.71 P1.55%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in EBUFMore in EJAN | EBUF | EJAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037 | EBUF +3.37 points | 3.61% | 0.24% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EBUF vs EJAN Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EBUF 0.89%
$16,872
EJAN 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EBUF | EJAN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,576 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $5,953 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $16,872 |
- 0.89%EBUF
- 0.89%EJAN
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
EBUF 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EJAN 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EBUF vs EJAN Dividends
- EBUF None
- EJAN None
Distribution history
EBUF vs EJAN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EBUF 5.5%EJAN 6.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EBUF 0.85EJAN 0.85Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- EBUF −6.5%EJAN −19.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EBUF 0.21EJAN 0.41
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.