Skip to content

EBUF vs EJAN

Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

EBUFBNYSE Arca

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

EJANBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.2%by weight

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

EBUF0.89%EJAN0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

EBUF 1.3×the volume

EBUF17.6KEJAN13.2K

EBUF vs EJAN Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.7%EBUF+8.8%EJAN

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. EBUF +7.7%. EJAN +8.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EBUF 0.89%
EJAN 0.89%
Fund size
EBUF $46M
EJAN $141M
1Y total return
EBUF +7.7%
EJAN +8.8%, better
Holdings
EBUF 3
EJAN 3
Avg volume (30D)
EBUF 17.6K sh, better
EJAN 13.2K sh
NAV per share
EBUF $30.58
EJAN $36.28
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EBUF: Cost 47, Risk 82, Mission 100, Tradability 72, Holdings not scored, Durability 76. EJAN: Cost 47, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 87.
Pillar letters and Scores for EBUF, EJAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEBUFEJAN
Cost30% weightC47C47
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightA82HigherB61
Tradability15% weightA72A84Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA76A87Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EBUF and EJAN are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

EBUF ranks 1st and EJAN 2nd of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BEBUFInnovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 2BEJANInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 61
  3. Rank 2BEOCTInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EBUFBInnovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

EJANBInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

In short

EBUF Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EBUF points the same machinery at emerging markets: MSCI EM exposure in roughly three-month stretches, with a 10% downside buffer and an upside cap reset at the start of each period.

EJAN Buffer ETFs almost all point at the S&P 500. EJAN aims the same machinery at emerging markets: EEM exposure with the first 15% of losses absorbed over a 12-month outcome period that restarts every January, in exchange for a cap reset each year.

Stated mandate

EBUF The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over each approximately three-month period, subject to a maximum upside return and a 10% downside buffer.

EJAN The fund seeks to track the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), subject to a predetermined upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • EBUF The 10% buffer is written into the strategy, not a manager's judgment call. Each roughly three-month outcome period starts with a fresh buffer and a fresh cap.innovatoretfs.com
  • Quarterly reset, not annual: the cap gets repriced four times a year instead of being set once and lived with for twelve months.
  • The reference is a mainstream MSCI Emerging Markets index fund, so the exposure under the buffer is a known quantity, not a bespoke basket.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.89% sits right at the median for buffer ETFs, and it is a 1940 Act fund rather than a bank note carrying issuer credit risk.
  • EJAN The buffer trade pointed at one of the bumpiest corners of equities: EEM upside to a cap, with the first 15% of losses over the outcome period absorbed by the options.innovatoretfs.com
  • Live since 2020 and through multiple annual resets, including down years for foreign stocks. The mechanism has real mileage, not just a back-test.globenewswire.com
  • A 1940 Act fund holding listed options, not a bank-issued note, so the defined outcome doesn't hang on one issuer's credit.innovatoretfs.com
  • January isn't the only door in. Innovator runs EM buffer siblings EJUL and EBUF, so the reset date can be laddered instead of concentrated on one calendar day.

Worth knowing

  • EBUF The buffer and cap apply over a full outcome period. Buy partway through and your actual protection and remaining upside differ from the headline terms.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, so bid-ask spreads can matter more than with a large, heavily traded ETF.
  • The options structure has not paid distributions, and upside is capped each period, so this is a shaped-return tool rather than an income or full-participation one.
  • EJAN The options reference EEM's price, not total return, so emerging-market dividends sit outside the deal and the fund has no regular distribution schedule.innovatoretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap are built for the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and your own downside cushion and remaining upside depend on where EEM has traveled since the reset.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.89% a year, matching the buffer-fund median but far above a plain EM index fund. Volume also runs light next to the big US-equity buffer names, so spreads can widen.

Full EBUF profile⁠

Full EJAN profile⁠

EBUF vs EJAN Holdings

How EBUF and EJAN differ

Overlap by weight

0.2%

Shared holdings make up 3.6% of EBUF and 0.2% of EJAN.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings1 in both0.2%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in EBUF and EJAN, widest gap first
SectorMore in EBUFMore in EJAN
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
MaterialsSame weight
EnergySame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EBUF and EJAN, widest gap first
CountryMore in EBUFMore in EJAN
TaiwanSame weight
South KoreaSame weight
ChinaSame weight
IndiaSame weight
BrazilSame weight
South AfricaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
PolandSame weight
Other countries (10)Same weight

Outside the US: EBUF 1% developed, 99% emerging. EJAN 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EBUF107.4%
  • EJAN103.6%

Securities held

  • EBUF3
  • EJAN3

Asset class

EBUF
Alternatives
EJAN
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EBUF2
  • In both1
  • Only in EJAN2

Only in EBUF

2 securities, 100% of EBUF by weight

  • Eem 12/31/2026 0.17 C93.64%
  • Eem 12/31/2026 66.79 P10.17%

Only in EJAN

2 securities, 100% of EJAN by weight

  • Eem 12/31/2026 0.55 C101.79%
  • Eem 12/31/2026 54.71 P1.55%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EBUF and EJAN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EBUFMore in EJAN
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037EBUF +3.37 points

All EBUF holdings⁠All 6 EJAN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EBUF vs EJAN Cost

Same expense ratio

$16,872

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EBUF 0.89%

    $16,872

  • EJAN 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EBUF 0.89%
  • EJAN 0.89%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530EBUF $16,872EJAN $16,872

Year by year

YearEBUFEJAN
10$1,576$1,576
20$5,953$5,953
30$16,872$16,872

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%EBUF
  • 0.89%EJAN
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EBUF 5th cheapest of 14 funds

EJAN 5th cheapest of 14 funds

EBUF vs EJAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
EBUF None
EJAN None

Distribution history

EBUFAll EBUF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EJANAll EJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

EBUF vs EJAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EBUF 5.5%since Aug 2024EJAN 6.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EBUF 0.85since Aug 2024EJAN 0.85Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EBUF −6.5%since Jul 2024EJAN −19.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EBUF 0.21EJAN 0.41

Popular comparisons

  • EBUFBvsEOCTB

    Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EJANBvsEOCTB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EBUFBvsEJULB

    Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EJANBvsEJULB

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EBUFBvsEAPRC

    Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EJANBvsEAPRC

    Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.