EBUF ranks 1st and EJUL 4th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.
EBUF vs EJUL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.89%0.89%
EJUL 3.2×the volume
17.6K55.9K
EBUF vs EJUL Performance
+7.7%+1.1%
- EBUF 0.89%
- EJUL 0.89%
- EBUF $46M
- EJUL $210M
- EBUF +7.7%, better
- EJUL +1.1%
- EBUF
- EJUL 0.00%
- EBUF 3
- EJUL 3
- EBUF 17.6K sh
- EJUL 55.9K sh, better
- EBUF $30.58
- EJUL $29.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EBUF | EJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | C47 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | A82Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | A72 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A76 | A93Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Same Category. EBUF and EJUL are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EBUFB
EJULB
In short
EBUF Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EBUF points the same machinery at emerging markets: MSCI EM exposure in roughly three-month stretches, with a 10% downside buffer and an upside cap reset at the start of each period.
EJUL Buffered downside is easy to find on the S&P 500. EJUL does it on emerging markets: it tracks EEM up to a cap and absorbs the first 15% of losses over a 12-month outcome period that resets every July.
Stated mandate
EBUF The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over each approximately three-month period, subject to a maximum upside return and a 10% downside buffer.
EJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF over the outcome period, subject to a stated upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EBUF vs EJUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EBUF vs EJUL Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EBUF 0.89%
$16,872
EJUL 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EBUF | EJUL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,576 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $5,953 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $16,872 |
- 0.89%EBUF
- 0.89%EJUL
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
EBUF 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EJUL 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EBUF vs EJUL Dividends
- EBUF
- EJUL 0.00%
- EBUF None
- EJUL None
Distribution history
EBUF vs EJUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EBUF 5.5%EJUL 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EBUF 0.85EJUL 0.73
- Worst fall
- EBUF −6.5%EJUL −19.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EBUF 0.21EJUL 0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.