EJAN ranks 2nd and EJUL 4th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.
EJAN vs EJUL
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.89%0.89%
EJUL 4.2×the volume
13.2K55.9K
EJAN +1.2pt
+3.9%+2.7%
EJAN vs EJUL Performance
+21.0%+14.3%
- EJAN 0.89%
- EJUL 0.89%
- EJAN $141M
- EJUL $210M
- EJAN +8.8%, better
- EJUL +1.1%
- EJAN
- EJUL 0.00%
- EJAN 3
- EJUL 3
- EJAN 13.2K sh
- EJUL 55.9K sh, better
- EJAN $36.28
- EJUL $29.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EJAN | EJUL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | C47 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | A73 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A87 | A93Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Same Category. EJAN and EJUL are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EJANB
EJULB
In short
EJAN Buffer ETFs almost all point at the S&P 500. EJAN aims the same machinery at emerging markets: EEM exposure with the first 15% of losses absorbed over a 12-month outcome period that restarts every January, in exchange for a cap reset each year.
EJUL Buffered downside is easy to find on the S&P 500. EJUL does it on emerging markets: it tracks EEM up to a cap and absorbs the first 15% of losses over a 12-month outcome period that resets every July.
Stated mandate
EJAN The fund seeks to track the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), subject to a predetermined upside cap, while buffering the first 15% of losses over the outcome period.
EJUL The Fund seeks to match the return of the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF over the outcome period, subject to a stated upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EJAN vs EJUL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EJAN vs EJUL Cost
Same expense ratio
$16,872
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EJAN 0.89%
$16,872
EJUL 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EJAN | EJUL |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,576 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $5,953 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $16,872 |
- 0.89%EJAN
- 0.89%EJUL
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
EJAN 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EJUL 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EJAN vs EJUL Dividends
- EJAN
- EJUL 0.00%
- EJAN None
- EJUL None
Distribution history
EJAN vs EJUL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EJAN
- EJUL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EJAN 6.9%, betterEJUL 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EJAN 0.85, betterEJUL 0.73
- Worst fall
- EJAN −19.7%EJUL −19.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EJAN 0.41EJUL 0.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.