Skip to content

ECH vs EWM

iShares MSCI Chile ETF

ECHBCboe

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

EWMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.2%by weight

Expense ratio

EWM −0.09pt a year

ECH0.59%EWM0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

ECH 2.5×the volume

ECH545KEWM214K

10Y return · a year

EWM +0.7pt

ECH+1.7%EWM+2.4%

ECH vs EWM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+75.0%ECH+23.7%EWM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. ECH +75.0%. EWM +23.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%50%100%125%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ECH 0.59%
EWM 0.50%, better
Fund size
ECH $785M
EWM $230M
1Y total return
ECH +0.2%
EWM +7.8%, better
Yield (12M)
ECH 2.26%
EWM 3.71%, better
Holdings
ECH 29
EWM 25
Avg volume (30D)
ECH 545K sh, better
EWM 214K sh
NAV per share
ECH $34.56
EWM $26.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ECH: Cost 50, Risk 41, Mission 70, Tradability 75, Holdings 48, Durability 77. EWM: Cost 88, Risk 78, Mission 43, Tradability 55, Holdings 41, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for ECH, EWM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarECHEWM
Cost30% weightC50A88Higher
Mission25% weightA70HigherC43
Risk15% weightC41A78Higher
Tradability15% weightA75HigherB55
Holdings10% weightC48HigherC41
Durability5% weightA77HigherB56

Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ECH and EWM are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 21 ›

EWM ranks 4th and ECH 6th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.

  1. Rank 1AEWWiShares MSCI Mexico ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2BFLMXFranklin FTSE Mexico ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BEPOLiShares MSCI Poland ETFScore 64
  4. Rank 4BEWMiShares MSCI Malaysia ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BEZAiShares MSCI South Africa ETFScore 61
  6. Rank 6BECHiShares MSCI Chile ETFScore 58
  7. Rank 7CUAEiShares MSCI UAE ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ECHBiShares MSCI Chile ETF

EWMBiShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

In short

ECH One ticker, one country. Since 2007 ECH has been the iShares route into Chilean equities, tracking the MSCI Chile IMI 25/50 index with a compact basket of roughly 25 stocks.

EWM Malaysia in one ticker, running since 1996. EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia index, a cap-weighted slice of Kuala Lumpur's largest listed companies, and charges less than the typical single-country emerging markets fund.

Stated mandate

ECH The fund seeks to track an index composed of Chilean equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Chile.

EWM The fund seeks to track an index composed of Malaysian equities.

Why people hold it

  • ECH Launched in 2007 and now a $1B-$5B fund, it is the long-running iShares wrapper for Chile rather than a recent launch chasing a theme.
  • The index's 25/50 caps rein in the largest names, so one Chilean heavyweight cannot swallow the whole basket.ishares.com
  • Charges 0.59% a year, level with the typical single-country emerging-market fund, and distributes quarterly.
  • Moderately traded for such a narrow mandate, and it lands in the upper half of its single-country emerging-market peer group.
  • EWM Listed in 1996, which puts it among the oldest ETFs still trading. Nearly three decades of doing one job: hold Malaysian equities, track the index.ishares.com
  • 0.50% a year, under the median for its single-country emerging markets peer group and below iShares siblings EPOL and EZA at 0.59%.
  • Sits in the upper tier of the single-country emerging markets funds we grade, helped by a low fee and a milder volatility profile than much of that group.
  • No guesswork about the mandate: BlackRock builds it as a way to express a single-country view on Malaysian companies, and the index name is right on the tin.ishares.com

Worth knowing

  • ECH Around 25 holdings in one small market: a single sector wobble or a Santiago policy headline can move the entire fund.
  • Fees sit at the category median, not below it. Cheaper single-country options exist, such as FLMX at 0.19%.
  • The shares are priced in dollars while the stocks trade in pesos, so Chilean currency swings ride along with the equities.
  • EWM Market-cap weighting in a modest-sized market means a short list of Kuala Lumpur heavyweights drives most of the fund's day-to-day move.stockanalysis.com
  • One country, one currency. The holdings trade in ringgit and the fund is unhedged, so currency moves against the dollar land in your return alongside the stocks.ishares.com
  • Volume is moderate rather than deep, and payouts arrive once or twice a year instead of quarterly. Limit orders are the friendlier way in and out.

Full ECH profile⁠

Full EWM profile⁠

ECH vs EWM Holdings

How ECH and EWM differ

Overlap by weight

0.2%

Shared holdings make up 0.2% of EWM and 0.2% of ECH.

Level by level

  • Countryby domicile0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.2%
  • Sector10 Sectors63.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ECH and EWM, widest gap first
SectorMore in ECHMore in EWM
FinancialsEWM +24.7 points
Consumer DiscretionaryECH +12.2 points
Consumer StaplesECH +7.4 points
Real EstateECH +7.1 points
MaterialsECH +7.0 points
CommunicationEWM +3.4 points
UtilitiesECH +3.3 points
EnergyEWM +3.1 points
Health CareEWM +3.0 points
IndustrialsEWM +2.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ECH and EWM, widest gap first
CountryMore in ECHMore in EWM
ChileECH +100.0 points
MalaysiaEWM +100.0 points

Outside the US: ECH 0% developed, 100% emerging. EWM 0% developed, 100% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ECH65.8%
  • EWM72.0%

Securities held

  • ECH26
  • EWM22

Asset class

ECH
Equity
EWM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ECH26
  • In both0
  • Only in EWM22

Only in ECH

26 securities, 99.8% of ECH by weight

  • Banco De Chile12.40%
  • Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile11.39%
  • Latam Airlines Group10.06%

Only in EWM

22 securities, 99.8% of EWM by weight

  • Public Bank16.00%
  • Cimb Group Holdings12.53%
  • Malayan Banking11.21%

Weight gaps

ECH and EWM share no securities.

All 26 ECH holdings⁠All 21 EWM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ECH vs EWM Cost

Overpaying ECH vs EWM

$1,656

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ECH 0.59%

    $11,635

  • EWM 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ECH 0.59%
  • EWM 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530ECH $11,635EWM $9,979

Year by year

YearECHEWMOverpaying
10$1,058$900$158
20$4,051$3,460$591
30$11,635$9,979$1,656

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%ECH
  • 0.50%EWM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
  • Median 0.59%

EWM 3rd cheapest of 21 funds

ECH 7th cheapest of 21 funds

ECH vs EWM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ECH 2.26%
EWM 3.71%, better
Payout (12M)
ECH $0.79
EWM $1.00
Last payment
ECH $0.64
EWM $0.57
Ex-dividend
ECH Jun 15, 2026
EWM Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
ECH Jun 18, 2026
EWM Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
ECH Twice a year
EWM Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ECHTwice a year · 21 paymentsAll ECH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.69; Dec 19, 2017 $0.05; Jun 19, 2018 $0.92; Dec 18, 2018 $0.06; Jun 17, 2019 $0.75; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Jun 15, 2020 $0.51; Dec 14, 2020 $0.15; Jun 10, 2021 $0.50; Dec 13, 2021 $0.68; Dec 30, 2021 $0.09; Jun 9, 2022 $1.13; Dec 13, 2022 $0.69; Jun 7, 2023 $1.17; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Jun 11, 2024 $0.70; Dec 17, 2024 $0.08; Jun 16, 2025 $0.67; Dec 16, 2025 $0.06; Dec 30, 2025 $0.08; Jun 15, 2026 $0.64. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
EWMTwice a year · 18 paymentsAll EWM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.35; Dec 19, 2017 $1.49; Jun 19, 2018 $0.64; Dec 18, 2018 $0.51; Jun 17, 2019 $0.52; Dec 16, 2019 $0.31; Jun 15, 2020 $0.54; Jun 10, 2021 $0.84; Dec 13, 2021 $0.78; Jun 9, 2022 $0.47; Dec 13, 2022 $0.22; Jun 7, 2023 $0.37; Dec 20, 2023 $0.37; Jun 11, 2024 $0.36; Dec 17, 2024 $0.45; Jun 16, 2025 $0.51; Dec 16, 2025 $0.43; Jun 15, 2026 $0.57. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

ECH vs EWM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • ECH
  • EWM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: ECH −25.6% · Oct 2023. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ECH 19.7%EWM 13.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ECH 0.61EWM 0.68, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ECH −25.6%EWM −22.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ECH 1.03EWM 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • ECHBvsEWWA

    iShares MSCI Chile ETF · iShares MSCI Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWMBvsEWWA

    iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF · iShares MSCI Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ECHBvsFLMXB

    iShares MSCI Chile ETF · Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWMBvsFLMXB

    iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF · Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ECHBvsEPOLB

    iShares MSCI Chile ETF · iShares MSCI Poland ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EWMBvsEPOLB

    iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF · iShares MSCI Poland ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.