FLMX ranks 2nd and ECH 6th of 21 funds in the Emerging Markets Single Country Category.
ECH vs FLMX
FLMX −0.40pt a year
0.59%0.19%
ECH 53.4×the volume
545K10.2K
FLMX +0.7pt
+11.8%+12.5%
ECH vs FLMX Performance
+75.0%+80.3%
- ECH 0.59%
- FLMX 0.19%, better
- ECH $785M
- FLMX $82M
- ECH +0.2%
- FLMX +16.3%, better
- ECH 2.26%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- ECH 29
- FLMX 39
- ECH 545K sh, better
- FLMX 10.2K sh
- ECH $34.56
- FLMX $36.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECH | FLMX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A70Higher | B65 |
| Risk | C41 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | C48 | B64Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Single Country funds
Same Category. ECH and FLMX are both graded against the same 21 Emerging Markets Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECHB
FLMXB
In short
ECH One ticker, one country. Since 2007 ECH has been the iShares route into Chilean equities, tracking the MSCI Chile IMI 25/50 index with a compact basket of roughly 25 stocks.
FLMX Mexico exposure at a discount. Franklin's tracker charges 0.19%, a fraction of what single-country emerging-market funds usually cost, and holds a compact basket of the country's largest listed companies.
Stated mandate
ECH The fund seeks to track an index composed of Chilean equities and provides targeted exposure to companies in Chile.
FLMX The Fund seeks to track the performance of the FTSE Mexico Capped Index before fees and expenses through an indexing strategy, investing at least 80% of assets in index components or related exposure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECH vs FLMX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECH vs FLMX Cost
Overpaying ECH vs FLMX
$7,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECH 0.59%
$11,635
FLMX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECH | FLMX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $347 | $711 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $1,351 | $2,700 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $3,952 | $7,683 |
- 0.59%ECH
- 0.19%FLMX, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Single Country funds
- Median 0.59%
FLMX cheapest of 21 funds
ECH 7th cheapest of 21 funds
ECH vs FLMX Dividends
- ECH 2.26%
- FLMX 3.91%, better
- ECH $0.79
- FLMX $1.42
- ECH $0.64
- FLMX $0.72
- ECH Jun 15, 2026
- FLMX Jun 26, 2026
- ECH Jun 18, 2026
- FLMX Jul 6, 2026
- ECH Twice a year
- FLMX Twice a year
Distribution history
ECH vs FLMX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECH
- FLMX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECH 19.7%, betterFLMX 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ECH 0.61, betterFLMX 0.55
- Worst fall
- ECH −25.6%, betterFLMX −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ECH 1.03FLMX 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.