PXH ranks 4th and ECOW 8th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
ECOW vs PXH
PXH −0.23pt a year
0.70%0.47%
PXH 6.1×the volume
36.8K223K
PXH +2.7pt
+7.0%+9.7%
ECOW vs PXH Performance
+40.6%+59.1%
- ECOW 0.70%
- PXH 0.47%, better
- ECOW $194M
- PXH $1.94B
- ECOW +7.9%
- PXH +13.1%, better
- ECOW 5.95%, better
- PXH 4.13%
- ECOW 107
- PXH 365
- ECOW 36.8K sh
- PXH 223K sh, better
- ECOW $25.50
- PXH $28.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ECOW | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | C44Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | B55Higher |
| Durability | D37 | A76Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. ECOW and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ECOWD
PXHB
In short
ECOW The emerging-markets arm of Pacer's Cash Cows family: rank the FTSE Emerging universe by free cash flow yield, keep the 100 best, then cap any single country or sector at 20 names. Cap-weighted EM this is not.
PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.
Stated mandate
ECOW The Fund seeks capital appreciation by screening the FTSE Emerging Markets Index for 100 emerging-market companies with high free cash flow yield.
PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ECOW vs PXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ECOW vs PXH Cost
Overpaying ECOW vs PXH
$4,188
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ECOW 0.70%
$13,606
PXH 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ECOW | PXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $847 | $403 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $3,261 | $1,499 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $9,418 | $4,188 |
- 0.70%ECOW
- 0.47%PXH, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds
ECOW 8th cheapest of 10 funds
ECOW vs PXH Dividends
- ECOW 5.95%, better
- PXH 4.13%
- ECOW $1.51
- PXH $1.16
- ECOW $0.56
- PXH $0.32
- ECOW Sep 3, 2026
- PXH Sep 21, 2026
- ECOW Sep 8, 2026
- PXH Sep 25, 2026
- ECOW Quarterly
- PXH Quarterly
Distribution history
ECOW vs PXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ECOW
- PXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ECOW 12.5%PXH 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ECOW 1.07PXH 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- ECOW −33.3%PXH −29.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ECOW 0.80PXH 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.