TQQQ ranks 1st and EDC 26th of 30 funds in the 3x Leveraged Long Category.
EDC vs TQQQ
TQQQ −0.31pt a year
1.09%0.78%
TQQQ 692.7×the volume
83.1K57.5M
TQQQ +37.3pt
+0.6%+37.9%
EDC vs TQQQ Performance
−20.9%+64.2%
- EDC 1.09%
- TQQQ 0.78%, better
- EDC $129M
- TQQQ $32.1B
- EDC +4.8%
- TQQQ +7.1%, better
- EDC 1.91%, better
- TQQQ 0.78%
- EDC 10
- TQQQ 116
- EDC 83.1K sh
- TQQQ 57.5M sh, better
- EDC $62.19
- TQQQ $61.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EDC | TQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F10 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | C46 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C51 | A79Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Long funds
Same Category. EDC and TQQQ are both graded against the same 30 3x Leveraged Long funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EDCD
TQQQA
In short
EDC The 3x aisle is mostly a bet on US indexes. EDC points the same daily leverage at the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, and has been doing it since 2008, through every emerging-market boom and bust since.
TQQQ The original 3x Nasdaq-100 trade, live since 2010. Leverage resets every day, chasing three times the index's one-day move, and it is one of the most heavily traded names in its corner of the market.
Stated mandate
EDC The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
TQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EDC vs TQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EDC vs TQQQ Cost
Overpaying EDC vs TQQQ
$5,131
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EDC 1.09%
$20,133
TQQQ 0.78%
$15,002
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EDC | TQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,388 | $527 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $5,268 | $1,898 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $15,002 | $5,131 |
- 1.09%EDC
- 0.78%TQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Long funds
- Median 0.96%
TQQQ 2nd cheapest of 30 funds
EDC 27th cheapest of 30 funds
EDC vs TQQQ Dividends
- EDC 1.91%, better
- TQQQ 0.78%
- EDC $1.10
- TQQQ $0.48
- EDC $0.22
- TQQQ $0.16
- EDC Sep 22, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- EDC Sep 29, 2026
- TQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- EDC Quarterly
- TQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
EDC vs TQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EDC
- TQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EDC 49.5%, betterTQQQ 56.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EDC 0.84TQQQ 0.98, better
- Worst fall
- EDC −75.5%, betterTQQQ −81.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EDC 2.56TQQQ 3.71
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.88%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.