SQQQ ranks 1st and EDZ 11th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
EDZ vs SQQQ
SQQQ −0.11pt a year
1.05%0.94%
SQQQ 210.7×the volume
240K50.5M
EDZ +20.7pt
−33.4%−54.1%
EDZ vs SQQQ Performance
−76.7%−93.1%
- EDZ 1.05%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- EDZ $27M
- SQQQ $2.1B
- EDZ −48.9%
- SQQQ −37.0%, better
- EDZ 4.69%
- SQQQ 7.61%, better
- EDZ 3
- SQQQ 12
- EDZ 240K sh
- SQQQ 50.5M sh, better
- EDZ $20.05
- SQQQ $47.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EDZ | SQQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | C49 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A92Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | |
| Durability | D39 | A73Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. EDZ and SQQQ are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EDZD
SQQQA
In short
EDZ The bear 3X shelf is mostly US indexes. EDZ is the one pointed overseas: a single ticker seeking -300% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index for one day, on the market since 2008. Built for short-term trading, with the daily reset that implies.
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
Stated mandate
EDZ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EDZ vs SQQQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EDZ vs SQQQ Cost
Overpaying EDZ vs SQQQ
$1,791
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EDZ 1.05%
$19,495
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EDZ | SQQQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,661 | $186 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $6,260 | $667 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $17,704 | $1,791 |
- 1.05%EDZ
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
EDZ 10th cheapest of 14 funds
EDZ vs SQQQ Dividends
- EDZ 4.69%
- SQQQ 7.61%, better
- EDZ $0.86
- SQQQ $3.25
- EDZ $0.18
- SQQQ $0.47
- EDZ Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- EDZ Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- EDZ Quarterly
- SQQQ Quarterly
Distribution history
EDZ vs SQQQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EDZ
- SQQQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EDZ 45.8%, betterSQQQ 48.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EDZ −1.27, betterSQQQ −1.42
- Worst fall
- EDZ −93.2%, betterSQQQ −97.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EDZ −2.23SQQQ −3.48
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 1.01%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.