SQQQ ranks 1st and TECS 7th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SQQQ vs TECS
SQQQ −0.07pt a year
0.94%1.01%
SQQQ 102.8×the volume
50M487K
SQQQ +6.8pt
−54.3%−61.1%
SQQQ vs TECS Performance
−93.7%−98.0%
- SQQQ 0.94%, better
- TECS 1.01%
- SQQQ $2.04B
- TECS $72M
- SQQQ −32.5%, better
- TECS −57.4%
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- TECS 6.44%
- SQQQ 12
- TECS 8
- SQQQ 50M sh, better
- TECS 487K sh
- SQQQ $41.85
- TECS $56.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SQQQ | TECS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | C47Higher | D27 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | C47 | |
| Durability | A73Higher | C46 |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SQQQ and TECS are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SQQQA
TECSC
In short
SQQQ The workhorse of the short-Nasdaq trade. Running since 2010, it aims at three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100's daily move, resets every session, and charges 0.94% a year, below the going rate in the 3x bear category.
TECS A three-times-daily short on the tech sector, in an ordinary ETF wrapper. TECS aims to deliver -3x the daily move of the Technology Select Sector Index, with no margin account and no borrowed shares involved.
Stated mandate
SQQQ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse of the Nasdaq-100 Index’s daily performance.
TECS The fund seeks daily investment results corresponding to the inverse of the Technology Select Sector Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SQQQ vs TECS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SQQQ vs TECS Cost
Overpaying TECS vs SQQQ
$1,146
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SQQQ 0.94%
$17,704
TECS 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SQQQ | TECS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,661 | $1,780 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,260 | $6,686 | $426 |
| 30 | $17,704 | $18,850 | $1,146 |
- 0.94%SQQQ, cheaper
- 1.01%TECS
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SQQQ cheapest of 14 funds
TECS 7th cheapest of 14 funds
SQQQ vs TECS Dividends
- SQQQ 7.78%, better
- TECS 6.44%
- SQQQ $3.25
- TECS $4.18
- SQQQ $0.47
- TECS $0.50
- SQQQ Sep 23, 2026
- TECS Sep 22, 2026
- SQQQ Sep 29, 2026
- TECS Sep 29, 2026
- SQQQ Quarterly
- TECS Quarterly
Distribution history
SQQQ vs TECS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SQQQ
- TECS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SQQQ 48.2%, betterTECS 59.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- SQQQ −1.42TECS −1.41, better
- Worst fall
- SQQQ −97.5%, betterTECS −99.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SQQQ −3.43TECS −3.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.94% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.