TZA ranks 4th and EDZ 11th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
EDZ vs TZA
TZA −0.06pt a year
1.05%0.99%
TZA 25.9×the volume
240K6.2M
EDZ +8.0pt
−33.4%−41.4%
EDZ vs TZA Performance
−76.7%−77.2%
- EDZ 1.05%
- TZA 0.99%, better
- EDZ $27M
- TZA $189M
- EDZ −48.9%
- TZA −43.5%, better
- EDZ 4.69%, better
- TZA 4.27%
- EDZ 3
- TZA 7
- EDZ 240K sh
- TZA 6.2M sh, better
- EDZ $20.05
- TZA $49.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EDZ | TZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | B64Higher |
| Mission | A79 | |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | D39 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39 | B59Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. EDZ and TZA are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EDZD
TZAB
In short
EDZ The bear 3X shelf is mostly US indexes. EDZ is the one pointed overseas: a single ticker seeking -300% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index for one day, on the market since 2008. Built for short-term trading, with the daily reset that implies.
TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.
Stated mandate
EDZ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EDZ vs TZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EDZ vs TZA Cost
Overpaying EDZ vs TZA
$970
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EDZ 1.05%
$19,495
TZA 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EDZ | TZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,746 | $101 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $6,565 | $362 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $18,525 | $970 |
- 1.05%EDZ
- 0.99%TZA, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds
EDZ 10th cheapest of 14 funds
EDZ vs TZA Dividends
- EDZ 4.69%, better
- TZA 4.27%
- EDZ $0.86
- TZA $1.90
- EDZ $0.18
- TZA $0.47
- EDZ Sep 22, 2026
- TZA Sep 22, 2026
- EDZ Sep 29, 2026
- TZA Sep 29, 2026
- EDZ Quarterly
- TZA Quarterly
Distribution history
EDZ vs TZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EDZ
- TZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EDZ 45.8%, betterTZA 53.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- EDZ −1.27TZA −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- EDZ −93.2%TZA −92.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EDZ −2.23TZA −3.27
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.