SRTY ranks 3rd and EDZ 11th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
EDZ vs SRTY
SRTY −0.10pt a year
1.05%0.95%
SRTY 6.7×the volume
240K1.6M
EDZ +9.1pt
−33.4%−42.5%
EDZ vs SRTY Performance
−76.7%−79.6%
- EDZ 1.05%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- EDZ $27M
- SRTY $76M
- EDZ −48.9%
- SRTY −43.5%, better
- EDZ 4.69%
- SRTY 6.17%, better
- EDZ 3
- SRTY 6
- EDZ 240K sh
- SRTY 1.6M sh, better
- EDZ $20.05
- SRTY $27.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EDZ | SRTY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A84Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | C49Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | D39 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39 | C54Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. EDZ and SRTY are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EDZD
SRTYA
In short
EDZ The bear 3X shelf is mostly US indexes. EDZ is the one pointed overseas: a single ticker seeking -300% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index for one day, on the market since 2008. Built for short-term trading, with the daily reset that implies.
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
Stated mandate
EDZ The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 300% of the inverse performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index.
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EDZ vs SRTY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EDZ vs SRTY Cost
Overpaying EDZ vs SRTY
$1,626
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EDZ 1.05%
$19,495
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EDZ | SRTY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $1,678 | $169 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $6,322 | $605 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $17,869 | $1,626 |
- 1.05%EDZ
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
EDZ 10th cheapest of 14 funds
EDZ vs SRTY Dividends
- EDZ 4.69%
- SRTY 6.17%, better
- EDZ $0.86
- SRTY $1.55
- EDZ $0.18
- SRTY $0.27
- EDZ Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- EDZ Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- EDZ Quarterly
- SRTY Quarterly
Distribution history
EDZ vs SRTY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EDZ
- SRTY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EDZ 45.8%, betterSRTY 54.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EDZ −1.27SRTY −1.04, better
- Worst fall
- EDZ −93.2%SRTY −92.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EDZ −2.23SRTY −3.27
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.