SRTY ranks 3rd and TZA 4th of 14 funds in the 3x Leveraged Inverse Category.
SRTY vs TZA
SRTY −0.04pt a year
0.95%0.99%
TZA 11.1×the volume
1.6M17.8M
TZA +1.0pt
−42.8%−41.8%
SRTY vs TZA Performance
−82.0%−79.9%
- SRTY 0.95%, better
- TZA 0.99%
- SRTY $68M
- TZA $191M
- SRTY −37.4%
- TZA −37.2%, better
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SRTY 5
- TZA 7
- SRTY 1.6M sh
- TZA 17.8M sh, better
- SRTY $26.34
- TZA $44.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SRTY | TZA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A83Higher | A75 |
| Risk | C53 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B63 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B56 | B60Higher |
Rank among 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
Same Category. SRTY and TZA are both graded against the same 14 3x Leveraged Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SRTYA
TZAB
In short
SRTY A one-day instrument by design: SRTY aims for three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, and it has been the ProShares small-cap bear since 2010.
TZA Born in the wreckage of 2008, TZA aims to move three times the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily swing. A heavily traded way to press a bearish small-cap view, with a daily reset that makes it a tool for days, not quarters.
Stated mandate
SRTY SRTY seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the inverse daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
TZA The Fund seeks daily inverse leveraged investment results equal to negative three times the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Its leverage makes it potentially riskier than nonleveraged alternatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SRTY vs TZA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SRTY vs TZA Cost
Overpaying TZA vs SRTY
$656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SRTY 0.95%
$17,869
TZA 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SRTY | TZA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,746 | $68 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,565 | $243 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $18,525 | $656 |
- 0.95%SRTY, cheaper
- 0.99%TZA
- Middle half of 3x Leveraged Inverse funds
- Median 1.02%
SRTY 2nd cheapest of 14 funds
TZA 5th cheapest of 14 funds
SRTY vs TZA Dividends
- SRTY 5.87%, better
- TZA 4.06%
- SRTY $1.55
- TZA $1.90
- SRTY $0.27
- TZA $0.47
- SRTY Sep 23, 2026
- TZA Sep 22, 2026
- SRTY Sep 29, 2026
- TZA Sep 29, 2026
- SRTY Quarterly
- TZA Quarterly
Distribution history
SRTY vs TZA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SRTY
- TZA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SRTY 54.0%TZA 53.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SRTY −1.04TZA −1.01, better
- Worst fall
- SRTY −92.8%TZA −92.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SRTY −3.24TZA −3.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.94%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.