PXH ranks 4th and EEMO 6th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
EEMO vs PXH
EEMO −0.18pt a year
0.29%0.47%
PXH 2.3×the volume
94.5K221K
PXH +4.2pt
+4.3%+8.5%
EEMO vs PXH Performance
+6.5%+55.4%
- EEMO 0.29%, better
- PXH 0.47%
- EEMO $57M
- PXH $1.95B
- EEMO −5.1%
- PXH +10.5%, better
- EEMO 2.33%
- PXH 4.22%, better
- EEMO 211
- PXH 365
- EEMO 94.5K sh
- PXH 221K sh, better
- EEMO $19.03
- PXH $28.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EEMO | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | C44 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F11 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | F24 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | D26 | B55Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A76Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. EEMO and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EEMOC
PXHB
In short
EEMO A momentum screen pointed at emerging markets. EEMO tracks an S&P index that favors EM large and mid caps with the strongest recent price trends, roughly 300 names, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.
Stated mandate
EEMO The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. It generally invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising the index, including qualifying depositary receipts.
PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EEMO vs PXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EEMO vs PXH Cost
Overpaying PXH vs EEMO
$3,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EEMO 0.29%
$5,952
PXH 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EEMO | PXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $847 | $320 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $3,261 | $1,217 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $9,418 | $3,466 |
- 0.29%EEMO, cheaper
- 0.47%PXH
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
EEMO 2nd cheapest of 10 funds
PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds
EEMO vs PXH Dividends
- EEMO 2.33%
- PXH 4.22%, better
- EEMO $0.39
- PXH $1.16
- EEMO $0.12
- PXH $0.32
- EEMO Sep 21, 2026
- PXH Sep 21, 2026
- EEMO Sep 25, 2026
- PXH Sep 25, 2026
- EEMO Quarterly
- PXH Quarterly
Distribution history
EEMO vs PXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EEMO
- PXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EEMO 24.7%PXH 11.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EEMO 0.57PXH 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- EEMO −35.2%PXH −29.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EEMO 1.14PXH 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.