RWM ranks 4th and EFU 32nd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
EFU vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 3937.4×the volume
7.62K30M
RWM +8.0pt
−19.1%−11.1%
EFU vs RWM Performance
−55.2%−18.3%
- EFU 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- EFU $1M
- RWM $163M
- EFU −21.1%
- RWM −10.2%, better
- EFU 4.12%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- EFU 1
- RWM 3
- EFU 7.62K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- EFU $7.38
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFU | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C42 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | F22 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | D36 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. EFU and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFUC
RWMB
In short
EFU Nearly every inverse ETF shorts America. EFU goes the other way: -2x the daily move of the MSCI EAFE index, the developed markets of Europe, Australasia and the Far East. A 2007-vintage tool with a one-day job.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
EFU EFU seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to -2x the daily performance of the MSCI EAFE Index.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFU vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFU vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFU 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFU | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%EFU
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
EFU 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
EFU vs RWM Dividends
- EFU 4.12%, better
- RWM 3.32%
- EFU $0.30
- RWM $0.48
- EFU $0.08
- RWM $0.09
- EFU Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- EFU Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- EFU Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
EFU vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFU
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFU 23.3%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EFU −1.45RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- EFU −77.4%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFU −1.23RWM −1.23Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.