IMCG ranks 2nd and EGUS 24th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
EGUS vs IMCG
IMCG −0.12pt a year
0.18%0.06%
IMCG 52.1×the volume
2.67K139K
EGUS +2.6pt
+22.1%+19.5%
EGUS vs IMCG Performance
+5.3%+15.5%
- EGUS 0.18%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- EGUS $28M
- IMCG $3.9B
- EGUS +5.3%
- IMCG +15.5%, better
- EGUS 0.21%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- EGUS 108
- IMCG 262
- EGUS 2.67K sh
- IMCG 139K sh, better
- EGUS $53.78
- IMCG $90.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EGUS | IMCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C49 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C43 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | D32 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | D27 | A76Higher |
| Durability | D30 | B69Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. EGUS and IMCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EGUSC
IMCGA
In short
EGUS Most ESG funds live in the middle of the market. EGUS moves the screen into the growth style box: it starts from MSCI's US large- and mid-cap growth universe, then optimizes toward better-rated ESG names while targeting risk and return close to the unscreened parent index.
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
Stated mandate
EGUS The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics and positive environmental, social and governance characteristics.
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EGUS vs IMCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EGUS vs IMCG Cost
Overpaying EGUS vs IMCG
$2,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EGUS 0.18%
$3,749
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EGUS | IMCG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $110 | $218 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $432 | $849 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $1,270 | $2,479 |
- 0.18%EGUS
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
EGUS 17th cheapest of 35 funds
EGUS vs IMCG Dividends
- EGUS 0.21%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- EGUS $0.12
- IMCG $0.62
- EGUS $0.03
- IMCG $0.19
- EGUS Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- EGUS Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- EGUS Quarterly
- IMCG Quarterly
Distribution history
EGUS vs IMCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EGUS 17.4%IMCG 16.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EGUS 1.12, betterIMCG 0.97
- Worst fall
- EGUS −24.9%IMCG −35.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EGUS 1.25IMCG 1.13
EGUS and IMCG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

