TSLR ranks 3rd and ELOL 8th of 10 funds in the 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) Category.
ELOL vs TSLR
0.0%by weight
TSLR −0.01pt a year
0.99%0.98%
TSLR 73.4×the volume
18K1.32M
ELOL vs TSLR Performance
+52.8%+57.6%
- ELOL 0.99%
- TSLR 0.98%, better
- ELOL $4M
- TSLR $79M
- ELOL
- TSLR −42.9%
- ELOL 3
- TSLR 2
- ELOL 18K sh
- TSLR 1.32M sh, better
- ELOL $22.61
- TSLR $19.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ELOL | TSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | C51Higher |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A87Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C42 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F21 | B63Higher |
Rank among 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) funds
Same Category. ELOL and TSLR are both graded against the same 10 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ELOLC
TSLRB
In short
TSLR Tesla, doubled, for a single day. TSLR aims for 2x TSLA's daily move through swaps, resets every night, and charges 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
Stated mandate
TSLR The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Tesla Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ELOL vs TSLR Holdings
How ELOL and TSLR differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ELOL and 0.0% of TSLR.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ELOL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ELOLMore in TSLR | ELOL | TSLR |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- ELOL210.8%
- TSLR100.0%
- ELOL1
- TSLR1
Asset class
- ELOL
- Equity
- TSLR
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in ELOL1
- In both0
- Only in TSLR1
Only in ELOL
1 security, 10.9% of ELOL by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204010.85%
Only in TSLR
1 security, 66.7% of TSLR by weight
- Tsla66.67%
Weight gaps
ELOL and TSLR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ELOL vs TSLR Cost
Overpaying ELOL vs TSLR
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ELOL 0.99%
$18,525
TSLR 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ELOL | TSLR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,729 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,504 | $61 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $18,362 | $163 |
- 0.99%ELOL
- 0.98%TSLR, cheaper
- Middle half of 2x Long Tesla (TSLA) funds
- Median 0.97%
TSLR 6th cheapest of 10 funds
ELOL 7th cheapest of 10 funds
ELOL vs TSLR Dividends
- ELOL None
- TSLR None
Distribution history
ELOL vs TSLR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ELOL TSLR 104.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ELOL TSLR 0.46
- Worst fall
- ELOL TSLR −82.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ELOL 0.00TSLR 3.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.83%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.83%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.