Skip to content

FDEM vs QLVE

Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

FDEMACboe

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLVE −0.07pt a year

FDEM0.25%QLVE0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

FDEM 216.6×the volume

FDEM87.5KQLVE404

5Y return · a year

FDEM +2.3pt

FDEM+9.3%QLVE+7.0%

FDEM vs QLVE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+55.9%FDEM+40.2%QLVE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. FDEM +55.9%. QLVE +40.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%80%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FDEM 0.25%
QLVE 0.18%, better
Fund size
FDEM $591M
QLVE $16M
1Y total return
FDEM +12.2%, better
QLVE +11.2%
Yield (12M)
FDEM 3.49%, better
QLVE 3.17%
Holdings
FDEM 229
QLVE 155
Avg volume (30D)
FDEM 87.5K sh, better
QLVE 404 sh
NAV per share
FDEM $33.73
QLVE $32.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FDEM: Cost 92, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 42, Durability 65. QLVE: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 11, Holdings 32, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for FDEM, QLVE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFDEMQLVE
Cost30% weightA92A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightB56B66Higher
Tradability15% weightB65HigherF11
Holdings10% weightC42HigherD32
Durability5% weightB65HigherD33

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FDEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

FDEM ranks 3rd and QLVE 7th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AEMGFiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AAVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3AFDEMFidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BQEMMState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 6BJPEMJPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 7BQLVENorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 61
  7. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FDEMAFidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

QLVEBNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.

QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.

QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.

Why people hold it

  • FDEM Four factor screens (value, quality, momentum, lower volatility) and then a twist most multifactor rivals skip: the index also leans toward stocks with lower correlation to the US market.sec.gov
  • At 0.25% a year, it undercuts the typical fund in the international multifactor group, where the median sits at 0.38%.
  • Rules over hunches: normally at least 80% of assets sit in index securities, so the screens drive the portfolio. Live since 2019, with distributions paid quarterly.sec.gov
  • QLVE At 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, it undercuts every top-scoring fund in its peer group, including EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%.
  • The index cuts the lowest-quality fifth of emerging-markets large and mid caps on profitability, cash flow and capital deployment, then optimizes the rest for lower volatility.flexshares.comnortherntrust.com
  • Sector, industry and country weights are held within set bands of the parent benchmark and turnover is capped near 12% a rebalance, curbing the sector drift low-vol screens invite.northerntrust.comsec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its emerging-markets factor peer group and has stayed close to its stated index.

Worth knowing

  • FDEM Selective by design: a couple hundred large- and mid-cap names, not the full emerging markets universe, so results diverge from plain market-cap EM index funds.sec.gov
  • Emerging markets carry currency, political and regulatory risk. A low-volatility screen aims to soften the ride relative to the broad EM market, not to remove the risk.sec.gov
  • Volume is moderate rather than heavy for the category, so spreads deserve a look on larger orders. The developed-market sibling FDEV runs cheaper at 0.18%.
  • QLVE Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights and limit orders matter more.
  • Roughly 160 holdings with meaningful weight in the largest names, so it is more top-heavy than a broad emerging-markets index fund.
  • Lower volatility is the design goal, not an outcome the fund controls: the index aims to be calmer than its parent, and the fund tracks it either way.sec.govflexshares.com

Full FDEM profile⁠

Full QLVE profile⁠

FDEM vs QLVE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FDEM vs QLVE Cost

Overpaying FDEM vs QLVE

$1,410

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FDEM 0.25%

    $5,159

  • QLVE 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FDEM 0.25%
  • QLVE 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530FDEM $5,159QLVE $3,749

Year by year

YearFDEMQLVEOverpaying
10$455$328$127
20$1,769$1,281$488
30$5,159$3,749$1,410

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%FDEM
  • 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QLVE cheapest of 20 funds

FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds

FDEM vs QLVE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FDEM 3.49%, better
QLVE 3.17%
Payout (12M)
FDEM $1.17
QLVE $1.02
Last payment
FDEM $0.38
QLVE $0.34
Ex-dividend
FDEM Sep 18, 2026
QLVE Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
FDEM Sep 22, 2026
QLVE Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
FDEM Quarterly
QLVE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

FDEMQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll FDEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Jun 21, 2019 $0.23; Sep 20, 2019 $0.23; Dec 20, 2019 $0.14; Mar 20, 2020 $0.11; Jun 19, 2020 $0.19; Sep 18, 2020 $0.11; Dec 18, 2020 $0.10; Mar 19, 2021 $0.09; Jun 18, 2021 $0.27; Sep 17, 2021 $0.18; Dec 17, 2021 $0.16; Dec 30, 2021 $0.007; Mar 18, 2022 $0.10; Jun 17, 2022 $0.37; Sep 16, 2022 $0.25; Dec 16, 2022 $0.12; Mar 17, 2023 $0.11; Jun 16, 2023 $0.39; Sep 15, 2023 $0.42; Dec 15, 2023 $0.12; Dec 28, 2023 $0.02; Mar 15, 2024 $0.12; Jun 21, 2024 $0.36; Sep 20, 2024 $0.24; Dec 20, 2024 $0.31; Mar 21, 2025 $0.15; Jun 20, 2025 $0.34; Sep 19, 2025 $0.28; Dec 19, 2025 $0.23; Mar 20, 2026 $0.16; Jun 18, 2026 $0.40; Sep 18, 2026 $0.38. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD
QLVEQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll QLVE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.0066; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $0.03; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.24; Dec 17, 2021 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.06; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.40; Dec 15, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2024 $0.16; Sep 20, 2024 $0.09; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Mar 21, 2025 $0.09; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.43; Dec 24, 2025 $0.0056; Jun 18, 2026 $0.24; Sep 18, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

FDEM vs QLVE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • FDEM
  • QLVE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FDEM −24.2% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FDEM 13.8%QLVE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FDEM 1.08QLVE 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FDEM −24.2%QLVE −23.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FDEM 0.98QLVE 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • FDEMAvsEMGFA

    Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsEMGFA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDEMAvsAVESA

    Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsAVESA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FDEMAvsQEMMB

    Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF · State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsQEMMB

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.