FDEM ranks 3rd and QLVE 7th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FDEM vs QLVE
QLVE −0.07pt a year
0.25%0.18%
FDEM 216.6×the volume
87.5K404
FDEM +2.3pt
+9.3%+7.0%
FDEM vs QLVE Performance
+55.9%+40.2%
- FDEM 0.25%
- QLVE 0.18%, better
- FDEM $591M
- QLVE $16M
- FDEM +12.2%, better
- QLVE +11.2%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- QLVE 3.17%
- FDEM 229
- QLVE 155
- FDEM 87.5K sh, better
- QLVE 404 sh
- FDEM $33.73
- QLVE $32.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEM | QLVE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | B56 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | F11 |
| Holdings | C42Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B65Higher | D33 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEMA
QLVEB
In short
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEM vs QLVE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEM vs QLVE Cost
Overpaying FDEM vs QLVE
$1,410
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
QLVE 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEM | QLVE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $328 | $127 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $1,281 | $488 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $3,749 | $1,410 |
- 0.25%FDEM
- 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QLVE cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM vs QLVE Dividends
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- QLVE 3.17%
- FDEM $1.17
- QLVE $1.02
- FDEM $0.38
- QLVE $0.34
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- QLVE Sep 18, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- QLVE Sep 24, 2026
- FDEM Quarterly
- QLVE Quarterly
Distribution history
FDEM vs QLVE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEM
- QLVE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEM 13.8%QLVE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEM 1.08QLVE 1.11, better
- Worst fall
- FDEM −24.2%QLVE −23.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FDEM 0.98QLVE 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.