Skip to content

EMGF vs QLVE

iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

EMGFACboe

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

35.1%by weight

Expense ratio

QLVE −0.08pt a year

EMGF0.26%QLVE0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

EMGF 385.2×the volume

EMGF156KQLVE404

5Y return · a year

EMGF +2.0pt

EMGF+9.0%QLVE+7.0%

EMGF vs QLVE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+53.9%EMGF+40.2%QLVE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. EMGF +53.9%. QLVE +40.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%80%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
EMGF 0.26%
QLVE 0.18%, better
Fund size
EMGF $1.79B
QLVE $16M
1Y total return
EMGF +14.5%, better
QLVE +11.2%
Yield (12M)
EMGF 2.19%
QLVE 3.17%, better
Holdings
EMGF 740
QLVE 155
Avg volume (30D)
EMGF 156K sh, better
QLVE 404 sh
NAV per share
EMGF $65.41
QLVE $32.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

EMGF: Cost 92, Risk 43, Mission not scored, Tradability 94, Holdings 48, Durability 89. QLVE: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 11, Holdings 32, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for EMGF, QLVE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarEMGFQLVE
Cost30% weightA92A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightC43B66Higher
Tradability15% weightA94HigherF11
Holdings10% weightC48HigherD32
Durability5% weightA89HigherD33

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. EMGF and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

EMGF ranks 1st and QLVE 7th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AEMGFiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AAVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 6BJPEMJPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 7BQLVENorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 61
  5. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

EMGFAiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

QLVEBNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.

QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.

QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.

Why people hold it

  • EMGF 0.26% a year, versus a 0.48% median across multifactor EM funds. It undercuts AVES, JPEM, ROAM and QEMM on fee.
  • Roughly 700 large- and mid-cap names, so the factor tilts sit on a broad base rather than a handful of concentrated bets.
  • Running since 2015 as a billion-dollar-plus iShares fund, with steady enough volume for routine retail orders.
  • On cost and ease of trading, one of the stronger builds in the multifactor emerging-markets group.
  • QLVE At 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, it undercuts every top-scoring fund in its peer group, including EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%.
  • The index cuts the lowest-quality fifth of emerging-markets large and mid caps on profitability, cash flow and capital deployment, then optimizes the rest for lower volatility.flexshares.comnortherntrust.com
  • Sector, industry and country weights are held within set bands of the parent benchmark and turnover is capped near 12% a rebalance, curbing the sector drift low-vol screens invite.northerntrust.comsec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its emerging-markets factor peer group and has stayed close to its stated index.

Worth knowing

  • EMGF Factor tilts mean the portfolio can drift well away from a plain cap-weighted EM index, in either direction, for long stretches.ishares.com
  • Emerging-market equity carries currency swings and country-level political risk on top of normal stock risk. Volatility here sits at the rougher end of its peer group.ishares.com
  • Distributions land annually or semiannually, not monthly, so it is not built as an income drip.
  • QLVE Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights and limit orders matter more.
  • Roughly 160 holdings with meaningful weight in the largest names, so it is more top-heavy than a broad emerging-markets index fund.
  • Lower volatility is the design goal, not an outcome the fund controls: the index aims to be calmer than its parent, and the fund tracks it either way.sec.govflexshares.com

Full EMGF profile⁠

Full QLVE profile⁠

EMGF vs QLVE Holdings

How EMGF and QLVE differ

Overlap by weight

35.1%

Shared holdings make up 65.8% of QLVE and 38.7% of EMGF.

Level by level

  • Holdings66 in both35.1%
  • Countryby domicile84.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors85.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in EMGF and QLVE, widest gap first
SectorMore in EMGFMore in QLVE
EnergyQLVE +4.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryEMGF +4.1 points
CommunicationQLVE +3.9 points
IndustrialsEMGF +3.8 points
FinancialsEMGF +3.0 points
MaterialsEMGF +2.8 points
Consumer StaplesQLVE +2.6 points
UtilitiesQLVE +2.2 points
Health CareQLVE +1.0 points
Real EstateEMGF +0.3 points
TechnologyEMGF +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in EMGF and QLVE, widest gap first
CountryMore in EMGFMore in QLVE
ChinaEMGF +8.2 points
MalaysiaQLVE +5.4 points
South AfricaEMGF +3.3 points
BrazilQLVE +3.1 points
IndiaQLVE +3.1 points
TaiwanEMGF +2.5 points
PhilippinesQLVE +1.5 points
PolandEMGF +1.1 points
Other countries (6)QLVE +2.0 points

Outside the US: EMGF 0% developed, 100% emerging. QLVE 0% developed, 100% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • EMGF30.5%
  • QLVE37.9%

Securities held

  • EMGF718
  • QLVE137

Asset class

EMGF
Equity
QLVE
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in EMGF652
  • In both66
  • Only in QLVE71

Only in EMGF

652 securities, 60.9% of EMGF by weight

  • Alibaba Group Holding1.82%
  • Ase Technology Holding0.67%
  • Icici Bank0.64%

Only in QLVE

71 securities, 33.1% of QLVE by weight

  • Hdfc Bank Ltd Common Stock Inr 11.28%
  • Infosys Ltd Common Stock Inr 51.10%
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd Common Stock Inr 11.03%

Weight gaps

All 66 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in EMGF and QLVE, widest gap first
HoldingMore in EMGFMore in QLVE
Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingQLVE +4.85 points
Industrial and Commercial Bank ofQLVE +1.53 points
Samsung Electronics Non Voting PreQLVE +1.36 points
Petroleo Brasileiro Pref SAQLVE +1.24 points
Chunghwa Telecom LtdQLVE +0.91 points
Petrochina HQLVE +0.87 points
Far Eastone Telecommunications LtdQLVE +0.84 points
Bb Seguridade SAQLVE +0.82 points

All 715 EMGF holdings⁠All 166 QLVE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

EMGF vs QLVE Cost

Overpaying EMGF vs QLVE

$1,609

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • EMGF 0.26%

    $5,358

  • QLVE 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • EMGF 0.26%
  • QLVE 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530EMGF $5,358QLVE $3,749

Year by year

YearEMGFQLVEOverpaying
10$473$328$145
20$1,838$1,281$557
30$5,358$3,749$1,609

Expense ratio

  • 0.26%EMGF
  • 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QLVE cheapest of 20 funds

EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds

EMGF vs QLVE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
EMGF 2.19%
QLVE 3.17%, better
Payout (12M)
EMGF $1.44
QLVE $1.02
Last payment
EMGF $0.61
QLVE $0.34
Ex-dividend
EMGF Jun 15, 2026
QLVE Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
EMGF Jun 18, 2026
QLVE Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
EMGF Twice a year
QLVE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

EMGFTwice a year · 21 paymentsAll EMGF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 21 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.27; Dec 19, 2017 $0.66; Dec 28, 2017 $0.04; Jun 19, 2018 $0.32; Dec 18, 2018 $0.73; Jun 17, 2019 $0.45; Dec 16, 2019 $0.75; Jun 15, 2020 $0.41; Dec 14, 2020 $0.55; Jun 10, 2021 $0.34; Dec 13, 2021 $0.90; Dec 30, 2021 $0.03; Jun 9, 2022 $0.45; Dec 13, 2022 $1.21; Jun 7, 2023 $0.43; Dec 20, 2023 $2.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.39; Dec 17, 2024 $1.16; Jun 16, 2025 $0.63; Dec 16, 2025 $0.83; Jun 15, 2026 $0.61. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
QLVEQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll QLVE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.0066; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $0.03; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.24; Dec 17, 2021 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.06; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.40; Dec 15, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2024 $0.16; Sep 20, 2024 $0.09; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Mar 21, 2025 $0.09; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.43; Dec 24, 2025 $0.0056; Jun 18, 2026 $0.24; Sep 18, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

EMGF vs QLVE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • EMGF
  • QLVE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: EMGF −27.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
EMGF 16.3%QLVE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
EMGF 1.09QLVE 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
EMGF −27.1%QLVE −23.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
EMGF 1.02QLVE 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • EMGFAvsAVESA

    iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsAVESA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMGFAvsFDEMA

    iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsFDEMA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • EMGFAvsQEMMB

    iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF · State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.26% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsQEMMB

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.30%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.